Get Permission Sudershan, Sheikh, Malik, Kumar, and Kumar: No association between rs6295 of 5-HT1A and risk of migraine: Evidence from meta-analysis


Introduction

Migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder that is more commonly found in women than in males and can have various cause.1 Serotonin (5-HT/ 5-hydroxytryptamine) has long been recognized as a key molecule in the development of migraine headaches.2 There are a lot of serotonin receptors in the central nervous system, and they're engaged in mediating a lot of different processes. One of these serotonin receptors is encoded by 5-HT1A (5q11.2-q13), which is responsible for encoding a protein that is 422 amino acids long.A common SNP controls the expression of the 5-HT1A gene called -1019C/G, also known as rs6295, in the promoter region of the gene.3 Thus, it was hypothesized that the variable in question could potentially determine susceptibility to the disease. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine the association between migraine susceptibility and rs6295 risk through the utilization of a meta-analysis methodology.

Materials and Methods

Following the PRISMA (prisma-statement.org) recommendations, we searched electronic databases including PubMed-NCBI, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholars for relevant articles after utilizinga combination of keywords, including "5-HT1A and risk of migraine," "-1019C/G and risks of migraine," and "rs6295 and risk of migraine," to search literature. After the following inclusion/exclusion criteria have been met (Figure 1B), several features can be extracted from each study (Table 1 ). The quality of all research was evaluated after data extraction using the criteria specified in the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (ohri.ca).

Genotypic and allelic frequencies were calculated followed by HWE (Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium) assessment. Association between the variant under study and migraine was done by using the Odds Ratio with a 95% Confidence Interval under different genetic models where a selection of the genetic models was based on the Dersimonian and Laird method (P < 0.10 or I2 > 50%: Random model) and the Mantel-Haenszel method (P ≥ 0.10 and I2 ≤ 50%). The heterogeneity and the publication bias were assessed using the χ2 based on Cochran's Q Test with I-square (I2) tests (<0.10) and Begg's and Egger's tests. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to determine how individual studies affected pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals using the condition "exclusion of each study” (Training.cochrane.org/handbook/current) (Figure 1C). The statistical analysis was carried out by Meta-Genyo(MetaGenyo: Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies). In addition, we also observed the power of study using post-hoc power calculator (Post-hoc Power Calculator (clincalc.com).

Results

After searching the available online database and systematically excluding studies (Figure 1A), a total of four studies were found that were conducted in different populations (Table 1) and discussed the association between rs6295 and migraine susceptibility. These studies were conducted in Turkey.4, 5 Germany.6 and China.7 After combining data from the four studies, the final group size was 1189 individuals, with 637 migraine sufferers and 552 healthy controls. It was found that the frequency of the variant allele (G-rs6295) was higher in the case group (q=51.88%) in comparison to the control group (q=50.72%). Furthermore, it was found that one study failed to appear in HWE; as a result, it was removed from further analysis.8 (Yucel et al., 2016); finally, three studies were further examined for association.4, 7

Figure 1

(A):Schematicrepresentation of literature survey according to PRISMA guidelines; (B): Inclusion and exclusion criteria; (C): Flow diagram depicts thestatistical test performed in the present analysis; (D): Forest plot represents the non-significant association between rs6295 and risk of migraine under the dominant model; (E): Symmetrical funnel plot depicts nopublication bias under the dominant model; (F): Sensitivity analysis for dominant model.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/0279cd24-5f0d-4f5e-94cd-9f990d36e9c9/image/53bc4ea6-5b48-404d-8b2f-cfea318edcb9-uimage.png

Table 1

Features of studies

Study

Region

Ethnicity

Diagnostic Criteria

Source of Controls

Case/ Controls

Tech

Type

Case

Control

HWE

NOS

HR

HT

HW

HR

HT

HW

Ates et al., 2013

Turkey

Caucasian

IHS

HB

203/202

PCR-RFLP

Migraine

43

92

68

46

87

69

0.14

6

Yucel et al., 2016

Turkey

Caucasian

ICHD

HB

135/139

Array

Migraine

28

64

43

32

53

54

0.04

6

Marziniak et al., 2007

Germany

Caucasian

IHS

HB

197/117

PCR-RFLP

Migraine

50

103

44

32

57

29

0.71

6

MA

26

53

19

MWA

24

50

25

Yang et al., 2005

China

Asian

IHS

HB

102/93

PCR-RFLP

Migraine

63

34

5

54

35

4

0.71

6

MA

20

16

2

MWA

43

18

3

[i] IHS: International Headache Society, ICHD: International Classification ofHeadache Disorders, HB: HospitalBased, MA: Migraine with Aura, MWA: Migraine without Aura, HR: Homozygote Recessive, HT: Heterozygote, HW: Homozygous Wild, HWE: HardyWeinberg Equilibrium,NOS:Newcastle-OttawaScale

Table 2

Overall association

Type

Model

Number of studies

Test of association

Test of heterogeneity

Publication bias

p-val (Egger's test)

OR

95% CI

p-val

Model

p-val

I^2

Migraine

Allele

3

1.01

0.8324-1.2233

0.927

F

0.9288

0

0.035

Recessive

3

0.98

0.7240-1.3130

0.868

F

0.7732

0

0.3117

Dominant

3

1.06

0.7681-1.4493

0.741

F

0.924

0

0.668

OD

3

1.06

0.8120-1.3809

0.672

F

0.6409

0

0.4032

HR vs HW

3

0.98

0.6587-1.4482

0.907

F

0.9794

0

0.9343

HR vs HT

3

0.96

0.6973-1.3126

0.784

F

0.6761

0

0.3647

HT vs HW

3

1.09

0.7776-1.5352

0.610

F

0.8509

0

0.5021

MA

Allele

2

1.02

0.7382-1.4077

0.907

F

0.4729

0

NA

Recessive

2

0.90

0.5617-1.4463

0.667

F

0.7009

0

NA

Dominant

2

1.27

0.6898-2.3431

0.442

F

0.5868

0

NA

OD

2

1.24

0.7998-1.9288

0.334

F

0.9254

0

NA

HR vs HW

2

1.14

0.5606-2.3242

0.715

F

0.6018

0

NA

HR vs HT

2

0.85

0.5169-1.3906

0.513

F

0.8834

0

NA

HT vs HW

2

1.34

0.7051-2.5524

0.371

F

0.6544

0

NA

MWA

Allele

2

1.03

0.7565-1.4151

0.831

F

0.3298

0

NA

Recessive

2

1.10

0.7030-1.7317

0.669

F

0.2401

0.275

NA

Dominant

2

0.96

0.5399-1.6972

0.881

F

0.949

0

NA

OD

2

0.90

0.5885-1.3686

0.615

F

0.2408

0.273

NA

HR vs HW

2

0.90

0.4593-1.7783

0.769

F

0.8207

0

NA

HR vs HT

2

1.13

0.7015-1.8154

0.618

F

0.2219

0.33

NA

HT vs HW

2

0.96

0.5239-1.7642

0.899

F

0.6548

0

NA

Concerning the association, the polled analysis showed that there is no significant association between the rs6295 and migraine under different genetic models such as allele (1.01 [0.83-1.22], p-value=0.927), dominant (1.06 [0.76-1.44], p-value=0.741) (Figure 1D), and recessive (0.98 [0.72-1.31], p-value=0.868) (Table 2). Further sub-grouping into two clinical subtypes no association was observed (Table 2). In addition to statistical association, no significant heterogeneity was observed therefore, fixed models were chosen for estimating the risk of association. Population-specific risk attribution was also observed but we failed to observe any statistically significant association. All genetic models demonstrated p-values more than the chosen value (Table 2), as indicated by the results of Egger's test, hence providing evidence that publication bias was absent (Figure 1E). Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis was also conducted on all genetic models by excluding individual trials, and the results indicated that the combined odds ratios did not exhibit significant alterations. This observation highlights the remarkable consistency and robustness of the meta-analysis (Figure 1F).

Furthermore, after evaluating the power of the study using the Post-hoc Power Calculator (Post-hoc Power Calculator (clincalc.com), it was discovered that the current sample size was insufficient to identify actual differences, which immediately reflects the requirement for additional samples.

Discussion

Migraine is considered a severe, disabling neurovascular disorder that is found to be more common in women than in men and can have different causes.8 and has been classified into two clinical subtypes i.e., migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MWA) (International Classification of Headache Disorders - ICHD-3). Serotonin (5-HT), a neurotransmitter, is thought to be one of the numerous elements that could lead to the development of migraine headaches. Serotonin is known to exert its effects on the brain via certain serotonin receptors, such as 5-HT1A. Pieces of evidence from different studies have shown thatthe receptors are present in the nuclei of the pontine raphe during the initial phase of migraine attacks.9 Additionally, it has been observed that during the interictal period, receptor density increases in the posterior cortical and limbic regions of migraine patients with MWA.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Since the expression of the protein can be altered by a polymorphic site in the promoter region (-1019C/G), researchers have suggested that this polymorphic site plays a role in determining disease susceptibility. After this, several separate studies were conducted to find the statistical association between the variant of interest and the risk of migraine.4, 5, 16, 7 However, the findings of all of these studies pointed to the same conclusion, which was “that there was no substantial connection between the two variables”. The other side of the coin is that drawing conclusions based on such small research samples doesn't tell us anything much. As a result, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to review the studies and determine the real risk involved.

After polling studies, we didn't find any significant risk of overall migraine due to rs6295 under different genetic models (Table 2). Further subgrouping based on the criteria of presence or absence of aura i.e., migraine with aura and migraine without aura, no significant association was observed in both groups after assuming different genetic models (Table 2). Therefore, it can be concluded that the variant (rs6295) is not statistically associated with the risk susceptibility to migraine which has been previously found by multiple independent studies.4, 5, 7 But it is also important to note that this non-significant association might be due to a low sample size which we observed using post-hoc calculation. However, there have been multiple pieces of evidence that showed that individuals who are homozygous carriers of the rs6295 gene show significant relief in their symptoms of nausea and headache. Therefore, it is also possible to propose that the variant may not be responsible for determining the risk of disease, but that it may be related to the alteration of clinical characteristics of migraine instead.16

Enclosing the section, the variant rs6295 is not associated with the risk of migraine or its clinical subtypes but, with a specific future perspective, more studies must be conducted in order to find a significant association.

Conclusion

Migraine is a complex disorder with polygenic inheritance and 5-HT1A was hypothesized to be involved in determining the disease susceptibility however the current study found that rs6295 did not represent a statistically significant risk to disease susceptibility.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Sources of Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Authors are highly thankful to the Institute of Human Genetics, University of Jammu, and Department of Human Genetics (Sri Pratap College, Srinagar, Cluster University Srinagar) for support in the present study.

References

1 

Y Yücel S Coşkun B Cengiz HH Özdemir E Uzar A Çim Association of Polymorphisms within the Serotonin Receptor Genes 5-HTR1A, 5-HTR1B, 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR2C and Migraine Susceptibility in a Turkish PopulationClin Psychopharmacol Neurosci20161432505

2 

A Sudershan K Mahajan K Singh M K Dhar P Kumar The complexities of migraine: A debate among migraine researchers: A reviewClin Neurol Neurosurg202221410713610.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107136

3 

E Hamel Serotonin and migraine: biology and clinical implicationsCephalalgia200727111293300

4 

PR Albert B Le François F Vahid-Ansari Genetic, epigenetic and posttranscriptional mechanisms for treatment of major depression: the 5-HT1A receptor gene as a paradigmJ Psychiatry Neurosci201944316476

5 

O Ates N Karakus S Sezer N Bozkurt Genetic association of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B gene polymorphisms with migraine in a Turkish populationJ Neurol Sci20133261-2647

6 

K Humińska-Lisowska J Chmielowiec K Chmielowiec A Strońska P Cięszczyk M Spieszny Association between polymorphism rs6295 of HTR1A serotonin receptor gene and personality traits among athletes of combat sportBiol Sport2024411295303

7 

M Marziniak R Mössner C Kienzler P Riederer KP Lesch C Sommer Functional polymorphisms of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor are associated with clinical symptoms in migraineursJ Neural Transm (Vienna)19961149122732

8 

Y Hernández-Díaz CA Tovilla-Zárate RG Castillo-Avila IE Juárez-Rojop AD Genis-Mendoza ML López-Narváez Association between the HTR1A rs6295 gene polymorphism and suicidal behavior: an updated meta-analysisEur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci20232731514

9 

XS Yang XP Xu QD Yang No association of C-1019G promoter polymorphism of 5-HT1A receptor gene with migraineEur J Neurol20061355335

10 

A Sudershan A C Pushap M Younis S Sudershan S Bhagat H Kumar Neuroepidemiology study of headache in the region of Jammu of north Indian population: A cross-sectional studyFront Neurol202313103094010.3389/fneur.2022.1030940

11 

P Gormley V Anttila BS Winsvold P Palta T Esko TH Pers Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraineNat Genet201648885666

12 

G Demarquay A Lothe J P Royet N Costes G Mick F Mauguière Brainstem changes in 5-HT1A receptor availability during migraine attackCephalalgia20113118494

13 

MR Islam DR Nyholt Glucose-Related Traits and Risk of Migraine-A Potential Mechanism and Treatment ConsiderationGenes (Basel)202213573010.3390/genes13050730

14 

A Lothe I Merlet G Demarquay N Costes P Ryvlin F Mauguière Interictal brain 5-HT1A receptors binding in migraine without aura: a 18F-MPPF-PET studyCephalalgia20082812128291

15 

Y Yücel S Coşkun B Cengiz HH Özdemir E Uzar A Çim The influence of the rs6295 gene polymorphism on serotonin-1A receptor distribution investigated with PET in patients with major depression applying machine learningTransl Psychiatry201776e115010.1038/tp.2017.108



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 02-10-2024

Accepted : 19-10-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijn.2024.044


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 200

PDF Downloaded: 36