Get Permission Bodepudi, Benerji, Cherukuri, Kodali, and Parvathaneni: Diagnostic concordance in consultation liaison psychiatry – Referring physicians to psychiatrists


Introduction

Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP) is essentially the study, practice, and teaching of the relation between medical and psychiatric disorders and serves as a bridge between psychiatry and other specialties.1 CLP has emerged in the past decade as a subspecialty of psychiatry, one concerned with mental health problems among medical and surgical patients.2 According to Lipowski, “Consultation” refers to the provision of expert opinion about the diagnosis and advice on management regarding a patient's mental state and behavior at the request of another health professional. "Liaison" refers to the linking up of groups for effective collaboration. 2 In a study conducted in Telangana by Srilakshmi Pingali et al (2020), most of the referrals were in the age group of 25-35 years, the majority were males (65%) and Hindu by religion (85%) and residing in rural areas (53.6%). Most of the patients were illiterate (37.9%), unemployed (30%), and belonged to low socioeconomic status (95%). 3

Studies conducted by Kennedy J et al (2018), Macharapu R et al (2018), Reddy VV (2016), and Keertish N et al (2013) showed that the majority of cases were referred from the Department of General Medicine. 4, 5, 6, 7 In A study done by Iniyan Selvamani et al (2022) in 310 referral patients, the mean age of the sample was 40.6 years with an SD of 16.3, majority were males (64.19%). 8 Earlier studies by Srilakshmi Pingali et al (2020) and Sandeep Grover et al (2017) showed the most common diagnosis by the psychiatry team is delirium (36.4%), followed by depression (12.1 %). 3, 9

In India, a study on the concordance of diagnosis between the referral team and psychiatrist has shown low concordance (κ<0.3) for depressive disorders and delirium, while substance dependence (κ=0.678) and suicidality (κ=0.655) had better diagnostic concordance. 9 A study conducted by Keerthy Reji et al (2020) reported diagnostic concordance as 40.9%.10 Medical–psychiatric comorbidity has huge impacts on health, functioning, and quality of life in patients and caregivers, as well as on the organization of the health care system.11

Physical illness is shown to have a strong association with psychiatric co-morbidity. Such association complicates the course and outcome of both conditions. 12, 13 Timely identification and intervention of such patients not only enhances recovery and prognosis but also helps to avoid wastage of resources and unnecessary investigations.14

Quality of health care is strongly influenced by efficient communication between different levels of care. Hence, CLP services can be regarded as a linchpin between psychiatry and other medical specialties.15 Earlier studies have evaluated referral rates and psychiatric diagnosis in India, but diagnostic concordance between the physicians/surgeons and the psychiatrists was rarely addressed.

This research is undertaken with the aim to study the patterns of referrals to the Department of Psychiatry and diagnostic concordance between referring physicians to psychiatrists.

Materials and Methods

The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Psychiatry of a tertiary care hospital after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All the patients referred to the Psychiatry department from other specialties over 4 months, (September 1, 2022 – February 28, 2023), whose referral notes had a reason for referral or psychiatric diagnosis mentioned were taken as samples for the study after excluding referrals sent for disability assessment. Patients above 18 years of age and willing to give consent were included.

Socio-demographic details were obtained using a questionnaire developed in the department of psychiatry with age, gender, region, education, occupation, socioeconomic status, marital status, family type (joint/nuclear), family support, referral department, reason for referral, psychiatric diagnosis by referring physician/surgeon, CL psychiatry diagnosis. The diagnosis was based on clinical interviews and other available information in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) Diagnostic Criteria for research, 10th revision. ICD-10, Diagnostic Criteria for Research was devised by the World Health Organization to standardize diagnosis and classification of mental disorders. 16

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 25.0 software and the kappa value was used to estimate the diagnostic concordance between the referring physicians to the CL psychiatric team. k value: Perfect agreement 0.81-1.0, Substantial agreement 0.61-0.8, Moderate agreement 0-41-0.6, Fair agreement 0.21-0.4, Slight agreement 0.01-0.2, No agreement 0.0.

Results

The total sample size comprised 100 referrals according to fixed criteria. The mean age of the sample was 40.96±13.42 years. The majority were males (63%), married (76%), residing in rural areas (55%), belonging to middle socioeconomic status (55%), and from nuclear families (88%). Most patients were illiterate (34%), and doing skilled jobs (45%). The majority of the cases referred were inpatients (61%), and most of them were from the medical specialties (85%), [General medicine -55, Neurology- 21] followed by surgical branches (15%). Alcohol dependence syndrome (24%) was the most common psychiatric diagnosis in patients referred to the CL psychiatric team, followed by depressive disorder (18%), and phobic anxiety disorder (18%).Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5

Table 1

Demographic data of the study population

Number (%)

Age

≤30 years

27 (27)

31-40 years

28 (28)

41-50 years

22 (22)

51-60 years

13 (13)

61-70 years

10 (10)

Gender

Male

63 (63)

Female

37 (37)

Region

Rural

55 (55)

Urban

45 (45)

Education

Post-graduate

5 (5)

Graduate

16 (16)

Intermediate & diploma

10 (10)

High school

12 (12)

Middle school

17 (17)

Primary school

6 (6)

Illiterate

34 (34)

Socioeconomic status

Low

42 (42)

Middle

55 (55)

High

3 (3)

Occupation

Professional

5 (5)

Manager

2 (2)

Clerks/shops

8 (8)

Semi-professional

1 (1)

Skilled

45 (45)

Semi-skilled

5 (5)

Unskilled

17 (17)

Unemployed

17 (17)

Marital status

Unmarried

11 (11)

Married

76 (76)

Divorced

4 (4)

Widowed

9 (9)

Type of family

Nuclear

88 (88)

Joint

5 (5)

Extended

7 (7)

Table 2

Source of referral

Referring department

Inpatients (number)

Outpatients (number)

Total

General Medicine

46

9

55

Neurology

9

12

21

Nephrology

2

1

3

Cardiology

2

1

3

Gastroenterology

1

0

1

Dermatology

0

1

1

Pulmonology

0

1

1

Surgery

4

0

4

Urology

1

0

1

CTVS

0

1

1

ENT

1

0

1

Ophthalmology

0

1

1

Orthopaedics

1

2

3

Obs/Gyn

0

4

4

Total

61

33

100

Table 3

Department-wise CL Psychiatry diagnosis of the sample

CL Psychiatry diagnosis

General Medicine

Neurol- ogy

Nephro- logy

Obg.

Cardio- logy

CTVS

Dermat- ology

ENT

Gastroent- erology

Urology

General surgery

Pulmon- ology

Orthopa- edics

Ophthalm- ology

Total

Alcohol dependence syndrome

16

5

1

1

1

24

Suicide

16

16

Depressive episode

6

5

3

1

2

1

18

Phobic anxiety disorder

10

2

2

1

1

1

1

18

BPAD

1

1

1

3

Delirium

2

1

3

Delusional disorder

1

2

3

Dissociative disorder

1

1

2

OCD

1

1

Adjustment disorder

1

1

ATPD

2

1

1

4

Paranoid schizophrenia

1

1

1

3

Phantom limb

1

1

Somatoform disorder

1

1

2

Vascular dementia

1

1

Total

55

21

3

4

3

1

1

1

1

1

4

1

3

1

100

Table 4

Diagnostic concordance

Diagnostic Concordance

Number (%)

Present

70 (84.3)

Absent

13 (15.6)

Total

83 (100)

Table 5

Psychiatric diagnosis of the sample

Final diagnosis

As per referral department (number)

As per CL-Psychiatry (number)

Kappa [k] value

Agreement

Alcohol dependence syndrome

23

24

0.936

Perfect agreement

Depressive episode

23

18

0.841

Perfect agreement

Phobic anxiety disorder

11

18

0.735

Substantial agreement

Acute and transient psychotic disorder

4

4

0.762

Substantial agreement

Bipolar affective disorder

3

3

1.000

Perfect agreement

Adjustment disorder

0

1

0

No agreement

Delirium

3

3

1.000

Perfect agreement

Delusional disorder

3

3

1.000

Perfect agreement

Dissociative disorder

2

2

1.000

Perfect agreement

Obsessive compulsive disorder

0

1

0

No agreement

Somatoform disorder

4

2

1.000

Perfect agreement

Paranoid schizophrenia

3

3

1.000

Perfect agreement

Vascular dementia

0

1

0

No agreement

Total

79

83

Diagnostic concordance has not been seen for cases referred for counseling for self-harm and phantom limb (17 cases). After excluding those cases, among 83 cases, diagnostic concordance was seen in 70 cases. The diagnostic concordance between the referring physician and the diagnosis made by the psychiatrist was found to be 84.3%. . k= >0.8 (perfect agreement) was seen with Alcohol dependence syndrome, depressive disorder, BPAD, delirium, delusional disorder, dissociative disorder, somatoform disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. k= >0.6-0.8 (substantial agreement) was seen with phobic anxiety disorder and ATPD. Concordance was low (k=0) in diagnosing OCD, adjustment disorder, and vascular dementia.

Discussion

The mean age of the sample was 40.96±13.42 (27.54-54.38) years. The majority were males (63%), residing in rural areas (55%), married (76%), and belonged to middle socioeconomic status (55%) and nuclear families (88%). Most patients were illiterate (34%), and doing skilled jobs (45%). A study conducted in Telangana by Srilakshmi Pingali et al (2020) showed similar results, but most referrals were of age 25-35 years, unemployed, and belonging to low SES.3 In a study conducted by Iniyan Selvamani et al (2022) in 310 referral patients, the mean age of the sample was 40.6 years with an SD of 16.3, and the majority (64.19%) were males. 8 In our study, the majority of the cases referred were inpatients (61%), and most of them were from the medical specialties (85%), [General medicine -55, Neurology- 21] followed by surgical branches (15%). Similar results were reported by a study wherein the majority of the cases were from the department of medicine (44.8%) followed by surgery (17.4%).8

The present study found that alcohol dependence syndrome (24%) was the most common psychiatric diagnosis in patients referred to the CL psychiatric team, and this was followed by depressive disorder (18%), and phobic anxiety disorder (18%). A possible reason for this increase in alcohol dependence syndrome is due to social drinking and binge usage of alcohol. A study done by Iniyan Selvamani et al (2022) showed the most common psychiatric disorder for referral was alcohol dependence syndrome. 8 Another study conducted in North India by Sandeep Grover et al (2017) showed the most common diagnosis made by the psychiatric team was delirium (43.4%) followed by depressive disorder (26%).9

In India, a study on the concordance of diagnosis between the referral team and psychiatrist has shown low concordance (κ<0.3) for depressive disorders and delirium, while substance dependence (κ=0.678) and suicidality (κ=0.655) had better diagnostic concordance.9 A study on the accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses in consultation liaison psychiatry in Saudi Arabia reported the concordance between the physician/surgeon’s diagnosis, and the diagnosis made by the psychiatrist as only 41.5%-47.4%.17 The diagnostic concordance in the present study between the referring physician and the diagnosis made by the psychiatrist was found to be 84.3%. An earlier study done by Keerthy Reji et al (2020) reported diagnostic concordance as 40.9%.10 Another study showed higher concordance according to kappa values.8

When compared to other studies, the present study showed overall higher concordance according to kappa values. k= >0.8 (perfect agreement) was seen with Alcohol dependence syndrome, depressive disorder, BPAD, delirium, delusional disorder, dissociative disorder, somatoform disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. k= >0.6-0.8 (substantial agreement) was seen with phobic anxiety disorder and ATPD. Concordance was low (k=0) in diagnosing OCD, adjustment disorder, and vascular dementia. In this study, although the concordance for many diagnoses was very high, the concordance for some illnesses like panic disorder and alcohol withdrawal was very poor. However, the present study suggests that the referral team was better at diagnosing psychiatric disorders.

Low concordance may be due to incomplete knowledge and training during undergraduate. This brings us to suggest that, including psychiatry as a full subject in the undergraduate medical curriculum may improve the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in other departments.

Strengths of the Study

This was a prospective study. Both the inpatient and outpatient referrals were included. Diagnostic Concordance was estimated between the referring physician/surgeon and psychiatrist.

Limitations of the Study

The sample size was small; the results obtained cannot be generalized. Referrals below 18 years were not included.

Conclusion

The majority of the cases were referred from the Department of General Medicine followed by the department of Neurology. The present study suggests that the most common primary psychiatry diagnosis was alcohol dependence syndrome, followed by depressive disorder, and phobic anxiety disorder. The overall diagnostic concordance was poor for adjustment disorder, OCD, and vascular dementia, and good for delirium, dissociative disorder, delusional disorder, BPAD, somatoform disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia.

Future Directions

Evaluating the impact of psychiatric morbidity on the clinical outcome of the patient would throw light on the beneficial effect of early identification, appropriate diagnosis, and adequate management in consultation-liaison psychiatry.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

B J Sadock VA Sadock Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences /Clinical Psychiatry.10th edn.Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphia200782930

2 

ZJ Lipowski Current trends in consultation-liaison psychiatryCan J Psychiatry198328532938

3 

S Pingali AK Joopaka RV Jangam M Umashankar Study of referrals to department of psychiatry in tertiary care general hospital settingTelangana J Psychiatry2020621669

4 

J Kennedy S Avudaiappan S Eswaran A Gup Pattern of Inpatient Consultation-liaison Psychiatry Utility in a Tertiary Care HospitalSBV J Basic, Clin Appl Health Sci20181A33641

5 

R Macharapu S Gurram M Kumar PK Reddy A study of psychiatric referrals from other specialties at a tertiary care centerArch Mental Health201819212935

6 

VV Reddy Referrals to psychiatry in a rural teaching hospitalJ Basic Clin Res201632117

7 

N Keertish MT Sathyanarayana BGH Kumar N Singh K Udagave Pattern of psychiatric referrals in a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern IndiaJ Clin Diagn Res201378168991

8 

I Selvamani A Sasidharan BH Sree BM Rekha S Dondapati Referral pattern of inpatients to Psychiatry Department and the diagnostic concordance between the referral departments and psychiatry team- A retrospective studyJ Clin Diagn Res2022686910.7860/JCDR/2022/55526.16809

9 

S Grover S Sahoo S Aggarwal S Dhiman S Chakrabarti A Avasthi Reasons for referral and diagnostic concordance between physicians/ surgeons and the consultation-liaison psychiatry team: An exploratory study from a tertiary care hospital in IndiaIndian J Psychiatry20175921705

10 

SP Sam K Reji S Thomas S Varughese J Geo V Vijayan Consultation Liaison Psychiatry - Diagnostic concordance between referring physician and psychiatristKerala J Psychiatry20203311626

11 

M Marchi FM Magarini G Mattei L Pingani M Moscara GM Galeazzi Diagnostic Agreement between Physicians and a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Team at a General Hospital: An Exploratory Study across 20 Years of ReferralsInt J Environ Res Public Health202118274910.3390/ijerph18020749

12 

AA Al-Atram Prevalence and patterns of psychiatric co-morbidity among adult medical inpatients: A Cross-sectional studyKuwait Med J20185044106

13 

MS Hansen P Fink M Frydenberg M Oxhøj L Søndergaard P Munk-Jørgensen Mental disorders among internal medical inpatients: Prevalence, detection, and treatment statusJ Psychosom Res2001504199204

14 

S Grover State of consultation-liaison psychiatry in India: Current status and vision for futureIndian J Psychiatry201153320213

15 

D Ramchandani TN Wise Clinician’s handbook of adult behavioral assessment: Practical resources for the mental health professionalPsychosomatics200647545510.1176/appi.psy.47.5.455

16 

J Phull ICD 10 in Psychiatry: A Learning GuideCRC PressLondon, England2021

17 

A Aljarad F Alosaimi YR Al-Huthail Accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses in consultation liaison psychiatryJ Taibah Univ Med Sci2008321238



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 27-11-2023

Accepted : 27-12-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2023.042


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 639

PDF Downloaded: 730