Get Permission Raju: Dee brain stimulation surgical procedure for sub thalamic nucleus and global pallidal neurons – A study with advanced microelectrode recording


Introduction

Intra-op microrecording/microelectrode-recording (MER)1 has been established to advance objective site throughout stereo tactic-surgical-operation.2, 3, 4 Benabid developed a holder with five parallel channels for micro/macro needles. 5, 6, 7 The needle for MER, which is incorporated in the electrode for test stimulation, is able to pick up electrical activity ofneurons within the proximity of the electrode because of its tiny angle. MER signals of STN spike-patterns designed for STN neurons located whichever within STN or in the globlal pallidal (GP) are quality-attributes, plus looks different as of neural/neuronal signal-spike-patterns of the neighboring anatomical-structures which makes the chance to discriminate the boundaries and limits of both aimed-structures.8, 9, 10, 11, 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 In addition, within sub thalamic nucleus pallidal neurons, adiversity-of-neurons, also sub structures might be documented familiar and predictable which separate functionally dissimilar regions. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

Even though microrecording discloses electrical-activity as well as signature-patterns of dissimilar sub structures-of-brain, it`s hard and complicated and complex to decide whether microrecording has the `positive-outcome` over the clinical finding of stimulations with deep brain stimulators therapeutic procedure.28, 29 Eventually, in the due course it might be significant to find-know whether application of the microrecording has a +Ve result over clinical findings plus whether pressure that the microrecording has had over the alternative option of objective which has been valuable and helful. Though these queries are quite problematica to respond it is because the diagnosis and clinical-prognostic finding is unwavering and single minded through several indeed many more factors than the use-of-microrecording alone`. Hence, which does not been aim-of present-study. Therefore, as the initial outcome of this `longitudinal-study` over the microrecording of the STN neural signals while the dee brain stimulators are `ON`. This was experimented to what extent application of microrecoring influences and impact the dee brain stimulators operational process (DBS neuro surgical-procedure). The comparative and virtual input of the physio logical-data achieved through the microrecording as well as diagnosis prognosis-clinical (diagnostic and prognostic) data obtained by intra op test stimulus to the assortment-of end-point for embedding the microelectrodes implantation was assessed. In addition, we observed to what extent, the behavioral-activity signature/pattern achieved through the microrecording characterized by the site or effectiveness of lead-point-based exclusively over the (3D-MRI). In conclusion, lastly, it was examined whether the objective lead-point depending on the finest recording, i.e., microrecording behavioral-activity coordinated and harmonized the lastly selected point for the macro-lead and microelectrode implantation depending on the intra op test stimuluses.

Materials and methods

Parkinson disease Patients-demographic’s

Since last four years, fifty-even successive and uninterrupted advanced idiopathic Parkinson diseased subjects (diseased patients) those who underwent the D B S within the sub thalamic nuclei, i.e., the S T N – D B S, plus twenty-eight uninterrupted PD-conditions (subjects who are patients diseased conditions) through whichever dystonic-movement disorder (size of the population `n=23`) and/or Pakinsonians (Parkinson’s disease, whose population size `n=5`) in whom the inner section of G P i- D B S was aimed were clubbed.

The data of the t w o of the sub thalamic nuclei conditions /patients couldn`t be employed because, within the patient through the bi lateral (/ two-sided left and tight hemispheres of the brain) implant, merely movement-activity as of the `central-channel-electrode` was acquired/recorded, plus in one more patient, a huge exterior electrical-stimulus artifacts/noise distortions were occurred. Within the twelve Parkinsonians, the operation was accomplished uni-laterally (one side). Which builds and creates (two sides and 46 patients) sub thalamic nucleuses-sides. The data of the three3 G P I neural patients couldn`t be employed because, in 1 single Parkinsonian, simply movement-activity as of middle/central-channel` was acquired/recorded, another Parkinsonian was operated overon through local-anesthesia, also within the acquisitioned-recordings of 3rd Parkinsonian, a huge outside electrical-stimulus noise artifacts were presenting.

In 4Parkinsonians, the neurooeration/surgery was done unilaterally (one-sided) which builds sum of overall forty six incorporations (i.e., implantation of electrode in forty-six Parkinsonian subjects) within Pallidal nucleus. Subjects were informed and obtained the consent intended and designed for the oeration/neurosurgical dee brain stimulation processing which includes support vector machine based microrecording. A few Parkinsonian subjects through the Parkinson’s disease merged within the study and were redicted/randomized to the sub thalamic nucleus and also globaus Pallidus nucleus, i.e., G P I – D B Sas part-of the higher multi center diagnostic-clinical/ and Prognostic test examination (on trial basis).

Addition/insertion or inclusion criterion for the operational-surgery (advanced idiopathic Parkinson’s disease through the invalidation motoric oscillations) plus elimination criterion (psychosis, cognitive dementia CD, cognitive impairment CI, hallucinations, memory issues, severe depression,/dementia, and universal normal wide-ranging contra indications for the neurosurgery) were the identical and equal for diseased patients, i.e., Parkinsonians allotted to the sub thalamic nucleus dee brain stimulations and global pallidal neurons dee brain stimulators implantations, as well as for the Parkinsonian subjects who are patients and who is not participate in test examinations. Local anesthesia to all the subjects were given by the authorized anesthetist only.

Deep brain stimulation technique

In this experiment the D B S technique is as follows. It’s a bi lateral means subject wo sided procedure and by applying the C R W frame-based three-dimensional imaging (3D-MRI) restorations aimed for computing plus directional-path-development, and by applying the microrecording and macrostimulation techniques.

The aimed-target co-ordinates applied were “12m ms” horizontal to standard plane of t h i r d ventricle, “2mm” subsequent/later-posterior to the mid commissural point (i.e., the MCP-point), and 4m m below the inter-commissural line (i.e., theICL) intended for s-nucleus, 21mm adjacent to the standard plane, 2mm forward (frontal) towards the M C P, 5mm beneath I C L aimed at pallidal neurons. Modifications were done depending on the graphical-image structure over the intending imaging (i.e., the M RI) in case needed. The directional-paths/directions aimed at central-electrode-channel were well-defined and demarcated through subsequent criterion: forward, i.e., frontal(anterior or forehead)angulation towards the I C L of the degrees from fifteen to twenty (15°–20°), adjacent/lateral-angulation as of mid – line(20°–30°) entrance (pass-entry) over the gyrus, plus sidestepping ad a thin line in the filed called ‘sulci’, c o r ti c a l- s u r f a c e veins, as well as side-ventricles`. Inside the bi lateral-cases, neurosurgical operation began over the left side of the Parkinsonian. 3to5 brace (steel) cannulas as well as micro electrodes were incorporated via a 12mm distance pre-coronal “burr-hole” which is very thin.

Each and every cannula`s keep on put off in dwelling during the neuro-operational-surgical procedural-process to scotch or stop the brain shift throughout, all through the DBS neurosurgery as well as prevention selecting the incorrect zone throughout embedding the end-channel-electrode. The electrodes were made by the Ms.Medtronic and their models are3389 by 4platinum/iridium cylinder-shaped exteriors (whose diameters are:1.3m m plus lengths are: 1.5m m) also through the inner link split of 0.5m ms. The Link’0’ is distal, plus link’3’ is highly-proximals. Since it was local anesthesia given and hence each and every patient was awakened also none were with the impact of narcotics, or tranquillizers, or downers (i.e.,sedatives). DBS neuro-surgery as well as microrecording was done understanding nightlong removal of the medicine (anti-Parkinsonian). For the verification of the effectiveness of the lead/electrode point, subjects undertook post op CRW-frame-based stereo tactic post op MRI imaging.

Microrecording procedure

For performing the microrecording at the extra cellular levels sole /single neuron multi unit microrecording is done through miniature (10μicron meters thickness) micro recording signals of the s-nuclei and global pallidal neurons were acquired though biomedical instrumentation/ differential amplifiers, nearly ten thousand-times amplified. Medtronic lead point machine with the boot strapping mechanism as well as referent band pass categorized amongst 0.5kHz-5kHz(−3dB;12dB/oct). All the waveforms were done with 12kHz-sampling frequency, i.e., sampled@12kHz. An analog to digital conversion card is employed whose dynamic range or pixel resolutions were16-bit then it was up sampled to the frequencies of24kHz. 2 seconds signal steadiness interval following the microelectrode passage interruption, multi neural sections acquired for the duration of five to twenty seconds (5s-20s).

Launching for the s-nucleus as well pallidal neurons eight and twelve millimeters (8mm-12mm) over the MR imaging-based goal, and then micro electrodes advanced within the steps-of five-hundred(500μm) to the goal via the human intervention micro drive. Once electrodes on the s-nuclei and pallidal (GPi,e) neurons zones at every distance or intensity, the s p i k i n g movement and behavioral-activity of those neurons sitting and situated within the proximity to the needle-electrodes, the pick up regional-zone upto200μm) can be acquired/recorded. Rest on the neural-density not >3units – >5units acquired asynchronously. However, those isolated and far away-units couldn`t be differentiated as of back ground signal-levels.

In connection with the intensity of embedding microelectrode within the s-nuclei stimulations through the deep brain stimulators, it`s a practice to embed the interaction connection numeral one (1) at point-location through the finest “stimulus-parameters”, via through the cordial connection two2mm beneath this ‘ideal-point’.

Figure 1

Sub thalamic neural movement and behavioral-activity for differentintensities:−2 and +5m m). Observe the minus readings relate to locational-points over the aimed region of STN. Insignificant s t n region−1 and 0m m) is distinctly established through the upsurge and inside and afterwards related-noise` as well as an abrupt rise within the rate-of-discharge (emitting)characterized by rhythmic bursts of activity in this case from 15 to 25 Hz. Deeper layers of the STN (+1.5 to 3.5 mm) show a more irregular high-frequency discharge pattern. SN activity (+5 mm) consists of a low-frequency tonic discharge.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6edee178-80ce-4a3a-a966-28b7e2797b56image1.png

Results

As per the electrode implantations and in all five channel electrodes, at any rate maximum in a channel there is microrecording activity and movement behavioral wise (as showed in Figure 1, Figure 2). Within the subthalamic-nucleus brain neurons, out of ninghty eight(98) cases, i.e., 9%, only nine (9) cases, i.e., (9/98), there was no recording activity within the cantrelchannel. Similarly, out of forty eight (48) cases, in (1), i.e., 2%, there was no microrecording activity and movement and thus behavioral aspect in the centralchannel and so its difficult to judge or conclude.

The tables1 pertaining to the (STN) computational data as well as table2 pertaining to the (GPi) depict the `frequency-allocation` of the final-choice forever the channel-electrode interfacing with the central, lateral, medial, (frontal)anterior, or exterior(posterior) channels derived from and founded on microrecording also macro stimulation test with DBS stimulations, and the allocation of the electrode -channels within which, the finest best recording was observed, i.e., the longest trajectory through the S T N and/or G P i neural/(neuronal) behavioral-activity. The middle one only was chosen, i.e.,central channel for embedding the electrodes forever within the sub thalamic nucleus-STN(50%) as well as in globus pallidal neuralGPi(57%). And also in sub thalamic nuclei-STN 64%cases, the channel electrode through the finest microrecording activity and behavior was selected for interfacing the electrodes forever. Similarly, in global alliduss neurons nuclei 61% cases, the channel electrode through the finest micro recording activity and behavior was selected for interfacing the electrodes forever.

The effectiveness of end electrode within the sub thalamic nucleus, was added frequently tangential, i.e., on the side/imaginative than medial to computationally aimed, 10%, i.e.,(10/98 tangential, and6%, i.e.,(6 / 98) medial also repeatedly frontal(anterior)24%, i.e.,(22/98) than the exterior, i.e., posterior(10% , i.e., (10 / 98), and or otherwise implanted within the middle, i.e., central.

The finest microrecording in sub thalamic nucleus was examined tangential (peripheral at a tangent and divergent) than medial plus higher frontal(anterior) than the exterior(posterior) as of the computed objective (i.e., determined target). The end-electrode point for globus pallidus has had propensity and predisposition to move laterally higher than medially. Even though in pallidal nucleus, the microrecording was maximum at the lateral(posterior) channel-electrode in 9 out of 46 cases, i.e., 20%cases, and because of dyskinesias, through the macrostimulation testing stimulations in 2of 9cases only, this channel-electrode was chosen for the stimulations forever. The frontal-channel electrode was applied very hardly ever, and also seldom. In bilaterally operated STN-DBS patients, The middle one was selected for embedding the end-electrode in the left brain(50%STN) sub thalamic nucleus as well as right side brain (39%STN) yet statistically insignificant p<=0.42 within the two sided electrode implantations performed in sub thalamic nucleus region with the stimulations through the deep brain stimulators. Likewise, the two sided bilateral brain, in the Parkinsonians was performed within the globus pallidal nucleus and the middle-central was selected for interfacing the end-electrode (82%in the left pallidal nucleus, 65%in the right-hemisphere pallidal nucleus. However, the p value was insignificant statistically, p<=0.37.

Table 1

Comparison between the channel with the best MER Activity and the channel finally chosen for permanent stimulation in the STN.

Results STN

Right (n=47)

Left (n=51)

Total (n=98)

Final electrode

Central

47% (22)

55% (28)

50%

Medial

8.5% (4)

4% (2)

6%

Lateral

15% (7)

6% (3)

10%

Anterior

25.5% (12)

20% (10)

24%

Posterior

4% (2)

15% (8)

10%

Best electrode

Central

47% (22)

47% (24)

47%

Medial

13% (6)

4% (2)

8%

Lateral

23% (11)

16% (8)

20%

Anterior

13% (6)

20% (10)

16%

Posterior

4% (2)

13% (7)

9%

Final best

Central

77% (17/22)

79% (19/24)

78% (36/46)

Medial

67% (4/6)

0% (0/2)

50% (4/8)

Lateral

36% (4/11)

25% (2/8)

32% (6/19)

Anterior

100% (6/6)

70% (7/10)

81% (13/16)

Posterior

50% (12)

57% (4/7)

55% (5/9)

Total

66% (31/47)

63% (32/51)

64% (63/98)

Table 2

Comparison between the channel with the best MER activity and the channel finally chosen for permanent stimulation in theGPi

Results GPi

Right (n=24)

Left (n=22)

Total (n=46)

Final electrode

Central

50% (12)

64% (14)

57%

Medial

8% (2)

18% (4)

13%

Lateral

34% (8)

9% (2)

22%

Anterior

4% (1)

0% (0)

2%

Posterior

4% (1)

9% (2)

6%

Best electrode

Central

54% (13)

54% (12)

54%

Medial

12.5% (3)

18% (4)

15%

Lateral

12.5% (3)

9% (2)

11%

Anterior

0% (0)

0% (0)

0%

Posterior

21% (5)

18% (4)

20%

Final best

Central

85% (11/13)

67% (8/12)

76% (19/250

Medial

33% (1/3)

50% (2/4)

43% (3/7)

Lateral

100% (3/3)

50% (1/2)

80% (4/5)

Anterior

0% (0/0)

0% (0/0)

0% (0/0)

Posterior

20% (1/5)

25% (1/4)

22% (2/9)

Total

67% (16/24)

54% (12/22)

61% (28/26)

The last and final(end) intensity of embedding or interfacing virtual to the imaging-based objective is shown in this experimental investigation (Figure 2). In support of the sub thalamic nucleus, the standard intensity of the genuine and earnest touching-point contacting—point for stimulus-electrode2.1mille meters, the standard deviation1.5mille meters, means, implying approximately correct communication flanked by the target-STN computed over the projecting image through the M R I, plus the usual standard (average-mean)point-of-contact was one(1mm), and because of the 2mille meters disparity flanked by the midpoints of two consecutive and succeeding connecting-sites.

Figure 2

Single/multi-unit activity of global pallidus nucleus intensity`s(−7.5mm and to the 0mille meters).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6edee178-80ce-4a3a-a966-28b7e2797b56image2.png

For globus palliidus nucleus neurons, the earnest and cordial connecting or contacting position embedded over the mean-average approximately at the computed intensity levels (the mean-average=−0.5mille meters and the standard deviation=1.2 mille meters, as shown in Figure 3.(B).

Figure 3

A: Sub thalamic nucleus frequency/sharing or allocation of final intensity of earnest contacting/connecting-point (mean=2.1mille meters, the standard deviation was 1.5mille meters) with regard to the magnetic resonance based imaging objective

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6edee178-80ce-4a3a-a966-28b7e2797b56image3.png

Figure 4

A: The frequency allocation of sub thalamic nucleus center of microrecordinng activity and behavior through in regard to magnetic resonance based objective image of s-nuclei B: `Scatter-plot` of connection among sub thalamic nucleus centre of micro recording-activity(parallel) as well as the last and final-end intensity of the earnest contacting-site (perpendicular) in regard to magnetic resonance based imaging objective o the sub thalamic nucleus aimed/target. The nucleus data of right brain as well as left-brain sub thalamic nucleus neurons were pooled.30, 31

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6edee178-80ce-4a3a-a966-28b7e2797b56image4.png

The intensity point of subthalamic nucleus central in regard to magnetic resonance based image objective was computed as of the commencement or start plus end-of s-nuclei and microrecording movement/activity of the M E R belongs to the electrode-channel which has had the finest movement and activity by of the microrecording. The average of frequency-allocation was0.0mille meters by the standard deviation of 1.6mille meters, shown in Figure 4(A). Mutually pooled through the findings illustrated in Figure 3(A), which means, over the mean-average, the contacting-point 1mm was positioned within the center of sub thalamic nucleus.

In Figure 4.(B) showing the contrast among sub thalamic nuclei central plus last and final end intensity interfacing of earnest contacting-site and virtual to magnetic resonance image based aimed objective which is established and confirmed that, a superior-range ±4mille meters for point of sub thalamic nucleus centre point than for lastly selected intensity-levels−1 and upto+5.

Conclusions

This study reveals that, the lastly selected intensity levels meant for the sub thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulations corresponded within the fifty-seven percent (57%) of Parkinsonians through pre operatively magnetic resonance aimed image objective with in the range-of±1mille meters. However, the option of selection of end objective also which of the channel electrode point given best ` t h e r a p e u t i c – w i n d o w` was supervised through microrecording activity-movement plus lastly resolute through the findings of intra op testing stimulations through the deep brain stimulators. 32, 33, 34, 35, 18, 12, 13, 36, 14, 24, 25, 37

According to the microrecording activity within the sub thalamic nucleus multi site multi-electrode multiple-channels, the early choice shall be done such that which channel-electrode might be absolute candidate for the final testing’s of macrostimulations -testing`s through the deep brain stimulations plus at what levels and at what intensities must be enthused. 38, 39, 40, 28, 30, 31

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

RL Alterman D Sterio A Beric PJ Kelly Microelectrode recording during posteroventral pallidotomy: impact on target selection and complicationsNeurosurgery19994423152110.1097/00006123-199902000-00036

2 

A Benazzouz S Breit A Koudsie P Pollak P Krack A L Benabid Intraoperative microrecordings of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s diseaseMov Disord200217Suppl 31459

3 

P Krack A Batir B N Van S Chabardes V Fraix C Ardouin Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s diseaseN Engl J Med20033492019253410.1056/NEJMoa035275

4 

AM Lozano WD Hutchison JO Dostrovsky Microelectrode monitoring of cortical and subcortical structures during stereotactic surgeryActa Neurochir Suppl19956430410.1007/978-3-7091-9419-5_7

5 

AL Benabid A Koudsie A Benazzouz L Vercueil V Fraix S Chabardes Deep brain stimulation of the corpus luysi (subthalamic nucleus) and other targets in Parkinson’s disease. Extension to new indications such as dystonia and epilepsyJ Neurol2001248Suppl 33747

6 

AL Benabid PP Krack A Benazzouz P Limousin A Koudsie P Pollak Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease: methodologic aspects and clinical criteriaNeurology20005512 Suppl 6404

7 

K Dolan HC Martens PR Schuurman LJ Bour Automatic noise-level detection for extra-cellular micro-electrode recordingsMed Biol Eng Comput200947779180010.1007/s11517-009-0494-4

8 

T Hashimoto Microrecording: a guide to stereotactic brain operationsNo Shinkei Geka2004323297303

9 

N Hayase N Miyashita K Endo H Narabayashi Neuronal activity in GP and Vim of parkinsonian patients and clinical changes of tremor through surgical interventionsStereotact Funct Neurosurg199871120810.1159/000029643

10 

WD Hutchison RJ Allan H Opitz R Levy JO Dostrovsky AE Lang Neurophysiological identification of the subthalamic nucleus in surgery for Parkinson's diseaseAnn Neurol1998444622810.1002/ana.410440407

11 

MS Kim YT Jung JH Sim SJ Kim JW Kim KJ Burchiel Microelectrode recording: lead point in STN-DBS surgeryActa Neurochir Suppl200699374210.1007/978-3-211-35205-2_7

12 

AM Lozano WD Hutchison Microelectrode recordings in the pallidumMov Disord200217Suppl 3150410.1002/mds.10157

13 

JL Molinuevo F Valldeoriola J Valls-Sole Usefulness of neurophysiologic techniques in stereotactic subthalamic nucleus stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s diseaseClin Neurophysiol2003114101793910.1016/s1388-2457(03)00160-3

14 

A Priori M Egidi A Pesenti M Rohr P Rampini M Locatelli Do intra-operative microrecordings improve subthalamic nucleus targeting in stereotactic neurosurgery for Parkinson’s disease?J Neurosurg Sci20034715660

15 

JL Vitek RA Bakay T Hashimoto Y Kaneoke K Mewes JY Zhang Microelectrode-guided pallidotomy: technical approach and its application in medically intractable Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosurg199888610274310.3171/jns.1998.88.6.1027

16 

JL Vitek V Chockkan JY Zhang Y Kaneoke M Evatt MR Delong Neuronal activity in the basal ganglia in patients with generalized dystonia and hemiballismusAnn Neurol1999461223510.1002/1531-8249(199907)46:1<22::aid-ana6>3.0.co;2-z

17 

P Zhuang Y J Li Characteristics of subthalamic neuronal activities in Parkinson's diseaseSheng Li Xue Bao200355443541

18 

W Hamel U Fietzek A Morsnowski B Schrader J Herzog D Weinert Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: evaluation of active electrode contactsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry200374810364610.1136/jnnp.74.8.1036

19 

W Hamel U Fietzek A Morsnowski B Schrader D Weinert D Muller Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: correlation of active electrode contacts with intraoperative microrecordingsStereotact Funct Neurosurg2003801-4374210.1159/000075158

20 

A Lozano W Hutchison Z Kiss R Tasker K Davis J Dostrovsky Methods for microelectrode-guided posteroventral pallidotomyJ Neurosurg199684219420210.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0194

21 

M Merello D Cerquetti A Cammarota E Tenca C Artes J Antico Neuronal globus pallidus activity in patients with generalised dystoniaMov Disord200419554854

22 

M Merello E Tenca D Cerquetti Neuronal activity of the zona incerta in Parkinson’s disease patientsMov Disord200621793743

23 

MC Rodriguez-Oroz M Rodriguez J Guridi K Mewes V Chockkman J Vitek The subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: somatotopic organization and physiological characteristicsBrain2001124Pt 917779010.1093/brain/124.9.1777

24 

P Romanelli V Esposito D W Schaal G Heit Somatotopy in the basal ganglia: experimental and clinical evidence for segregated sensorimotor channelsBrain Res Brain Res Rev20054811122810.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.09.008

25 

P Romanelli G Heit B C Hill A Kraus T Hastie HM Bronte-Stewart Microelectrode recording revealing a somatotopic body map in the subthalamic nucleus in humans with Parkinson diseaseJ Neurosurg20041004611810.3171/jns.2004.100.4.0611

26 

JK Tang E Moro N Mahant WD Hutchison AE Lang AM Lozano Neuronal firing rates and patterns in the globus pallidus internus of patients with cervical dystonia differ from those with Parkinson's diseaseJ Neurophysiol2007982720910.1152/jn.01107.2006

27 

PV Theodosopoulos WJ Marks CC Starr PA Starr Locations of movement-related cells in the human subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's diseaseMov Disord2003187791810.1002/mds.10446

28 

MI Hariz Safety and risk of microelectrode recording in surgery for movement disordersStereotact Funct Neurosurg2002783-41465710.1159/000068960

29 

MI Hariz H Fodstad Do microelectrode techniques increase accuracy or decrease risks in pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation? A critical review of the literatureStereotact Funct Neurosurg1999722-41576910.1159/000029720

30 

P Pollak P Krack V Fraix A Mendes E Moro S Chabardes Intraoperative micro- and macrostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s diseaseMov Disord200217Suppl 315561

31 

Y Temel P Wilbrink A Duits P Boon S Tromp L Ackermans Single electrode and multiple electrode guided electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s diseaseNeurosurgery2007615 Suppl 23465510.1227/01.neu.0000303993.82149.98

32 

P Duque O Mateo F Ruiz JG De Viloria A Contreras F Grandas Intraoperative microrecording under general anaesthesia with bispectral analysis monitoring in a case of deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s diseaseEur J Neurol2008158767710.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02166.x

33 

RA Esselink RM De Bie RJ De Haan EN Steur GN Beute AT Portman Unilateral pallidotomy versus bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: one year follow-up of a randomised observer-blind multi centre trialActa Neurochir (Wien)20061481212475510.1007/s00701-006-0907-1

34 

J Guridi A Gorospe E Ramos G Linazasoro MC Rodriguez JA Obeso Stereotactic targeting of the globus pallidus internus in Parkinson’s disease: imaging versus electrophysiological mappingNeurosurgery19994522788710.1097/00006123-199908000-00017

35 

J Guridi MC Rodriguez-Oroz E Ramos G Linazasoro JA Obeso Discrepancy between imaging and neurophysiology in deep brain stimulation of medial pallidum and subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's diseaseNeurologia200217418392

36 

A Moran H Bergman Z Israel I Bar-Gad Subthalamic nucleus functional organization revealed by parkinsonian neuronal oscillations and synchronyBrain200813112339540910.1093/brain/awn270

37 

JD Speelman R Schuurman RM De Bie RA Esselink DA Bosch Stereotactic neurosurgery for tremorMov Disord200217Suppl 384810.1002/mds.10147

38 

DK Binder GM Rau PA Starr Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulator implantation for movement disordersNeurosurgery200556472232

39 

RM De Bie RJ De Haan PR Schuurman RA Esselink DA Bosch JD Speelman Morbidity and mortality following pallid-otomy in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic reviewNeurology2002587100812 10.1212/wnl.58.7.1008

40 

WJ Elias KM Fu RC Frysinger Cortical and subcortical brain shift during stereotactic proceduresJ Neurosurg20071075983810.3171/JNS-07/11/0983



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 24-07-2023

Accepted : 08-09-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2023.031


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 633

PDF Downloaded: 270