Get Permission Raju: β-oscillations linked by neuronal-spiking in the STN via DBS of parkinson disease: Part – I


Introduction

Typical head-worn brain surface (wired or wireless) EEG electrodes beta (β) band frequencies are amongst 13 Hz to 30 Hz. However, in the Parkinson`s the high beata frequency is between 20 Hz to 30 Hz.1 Atypical β-oscillations in the Basal- Ganglia (BG) were linked in the field of Patho physiology of Parkinson disease(PD). The β-oscillations in sub thalamic nucleus (STN) are decreased in conjunction with voluntary movement,1 a combined L-Dopa2 and deep brain stimulation (DBS) study,3 implied and indicated that the β-oscillations might be anti-kinetic.4 On the other hand, γ plus high-frequency (200–500Hz; 60 –90Hz) oscillations, i.e., HFOs, that are further prominent in the existence of exogenic-dopamine while DBS is on “ON state, i.e., DBS-ON”,5, 6 might be pro-kinetic since the movement provokes (or stimulates), i.e., elicits and enhances in phantom (spectral) power in these frequency-bands.7, 8, 9 However, in what way abnormal (aberrant) activities of these fluctuations advances and indicates to the hypo kinetic motoric features of Parkinson disease is not wholly established.

Some studies indicating that it might not be beta β-fluctuations, as such, intrinsically however instead its impact on neuronal activity implicated in the sphere of motoric processing which cause the failure to choose particular programmes of motoric-activity as well as movement.10, 11, 12 These connections, conceding the information coding skill or rational springiness of the motoric circuitry, possibly will occur at the point of individual neurons1, 13 or of neural-net-works.9, 14, 15, 16 Therefore, β fluctuations attune of single-unit (SU) spiking—activity (SA), i.e., single unit activity (SUA) or single neuron activity (SNA).17, 18, 19 or else pro kinetic higher frequency fluctuations[9] in the region of the subthalamus might well establish the patho-logic mechanism which yields to the detected hypo kinetic symptoms within the Parkinson subjects (patients). Microelectrode recording (MER) signals acquired in the course of DBS surgical-procedure suggest a chance to precisely investigate these connections in the motoric-circuit of Parkinson.

We gathered the field potentials, i.e., LFPs around the nuclei, i.e., STN to observe the spatio-magnitude of cross-correlation through transformed frequency domain Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) frequency connections amongst β-fluctuations as well as high frequency oscillations. Results showed that the connections were extremely significant and very valuable at the d o r s a l sub thalamic nuclei border also, the intensity of these interfaces were linked to the experimental value of DBS stimuli. Single and multi-unit activity (SUA and MUA) of STN neurons were acquired with support vector machine (SVM) based MER system asynchronously (parallelly) and the main purpose is to study the areal point of locked electrical field potentials movement and activity. We notice that these connections or interfaces were highest at the d o r s a l STN border. We largely observed the co-existence and co-incidence incidence of FFT based cross-correlation frequency also local electrical-field-spikes contacts and found no evidence of a causal relationship.

Figure 1

MER acquisitions of basal ganglion; A: Sagittal-view-of a sample trajectory-path (red-colored slope from the area of SN to thalamus) to the direction of sub thalamic nuclei, going across thalamus, ZI, followed by SN. Right-side showing the M E R signals/waveforms determine usual cell-recordings from these cortico and subcortical structures; B: 3electrodes asynchronously, i.e., parallelly and concurrently too were progressive, unglued as of all other in the 4 directions, namely,frontal, lateral, median, or cross with 2mm apart; C: Aggregate of inferred macro electrode (for macro stimulation) /microelectrode recordings (for micro electrodes) at every individually recording the intensity (depth) or complexity (or gravity) through all routes(trajectories) indicating S.T.N-M.E.R.s.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f419138b-22af-405f-b1dd-b902eab8cf3dimage1.png

Aims and Objectives

To study the contacts and connections of the stimulating electrodes implanted by DBS surgical procedure.

To acquire the concurrent spike recordings of the electrically local field potentials and also single and multi-unit activities of the parallelly connected basal ganglion circuitry in the nervous system, i.e., MER with bilateral sub thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson`s. Phase of the amplitude through the stimulus intensity by the micro and macro electrodes by microelectrodes stimulations and macrostimulations coupling in the sub thalamic nuclei which was precise to β-phase plus high frequency oscillations stimulus amplitudes, followed by the coupling at the abaxial sub thalamic nucleus border.

Materials and Methods

The data-analyses were achieved by applying the custom-built MATLAB (offline) software-scripts (Math Works). We applied a two-tailed ‘t-test’ to evaluate for statistical significancy together with the implementation of a chi-square test and degree of freedom so as to say whether statistically significant on the validation of chi-square , and except if not (or-else) remarked.

Clinical demography and characteristics of Parkinson subjects and DBS operational procedure

We captured intraoperative recordings in 12 Parkinson`s diseased subjects, i.e., patients with a male female ratio 7:5 (7 male and 5male) through advanced idiopathic Parkinson disease PD undergoing minimally invasive deep brain stimulation surgery (i.e., DBS procedural operational surgery) of the bi lateral subthalamic nucleus - S T N. Every Parkinson subject based on United Kingdom (UK) brain bank criterion for invasive (minimal) operating dealing of the Parkinson`s diseased patients as well as endured and experienced the DBS-surgery followed by immediate and instantaneously L-Dopa (levodopa) dopaminergic-medication removal, typically 12hours since the last-dose). Each and every signal-recording, i.e., MER signal recording was gathered when the Parkinson subjects were conscious, widely-awakened and during their rest, as well as examined for carefully and hence attentively observance. Following, the sub thalamic nucleus was confined structurally/anatomically on pre op magnetic resonance-imaging as well as by intra operatively its stimulating-firing-patterns (SFPs) and also related activity, Figure 1. A. right-hand side. The x and y plane, i.e., x and y axes co -ordinates of the pre-operative target, referenced to the midcommissural point, were x=11.1±0.2 (mean±SEM), y= —3.5±0.5, z=4.9±0.3mm for the left-hemi-sphere (i.e., left-side brain), and x= —11.5±0.21, y= —3.6±0.5, z=5.01± 0.3mm for the right-hemi-sphere (i.e., right-side brain). All the Parkinson subjects (patients) were embedded the micro and macro electrodes with Medtronic (USA maker) deep brain stimulations—DBS lead-models:3389 (1.5mm contacts with center-to-center distances of 2mm.

Signal recording

The intra operative micro electrode signal recordings by applying the directing or pointing electrodes encompassing a couple of macro lead-electrode (for macro stimulations) and micro-electrode recording contacts, wherein the macro electrode interaction was 3.5mm superior to the micro electrode stimulating contact. Equal to the 3 aimed-electrodes, i.e., targeting-electrodes were parallelly forward-thinking to the pre op target throughout and all through every MER recording session. The just acquired raw signals—waveforms were sampled at 1.5kHz-frequency and 24kHz-frequency as of macro electrodes as well as micro electrodes, correspondingly, plus accumulated by using the micro α-ω(alpha-omega)guide pro-data acquisition-system. Micro electrode signal (data) since on or after the first 4 PD subjects/ patients were filtered with high-pass filter ~>=300Hz, whose frequency is over≥300Hz through a acausal skull-opening-stage filter (head). Per se, intrinsically, we discarded the micro electrodes data(i.e., MER-signals data) on or after the first 4 Parkinson`s subjects from our inferences that we have drawn. For later and successive PD patients, the raw micro electrode data (MER signals) were gathered by applying a broad band frequency ranging from 1.5Hz to 3kHz acausal skull-cranium (head) opened-stage filter. The local field electrical potentials were elicited through the band pass filters and macro-lead-electrode (MLR) and micro electrode (MER) signals amid 1Hz to 500Hz, and with a 50Hz notch-filter so as to uproot the noise from electrical appliances instrument mains lines, acoustics, etc. (according to Indian English Channel).

All the local field electrical potentials were sampled down(down—sampled) to 0.5kHz and referenced macro lead-electrodes and micro electrode were signals by applying a common average of every signal acquired with the macro lead electrodes and micro electrodes signals/waveforms concurrently. We encountered some artifacts like horse-jumps in the waveforms which were also detected in local field electrical potentials beta-oscillations while every acquiring signal during the z scored broad band (wide band) frequencies ranging from 20Hertz to 300Hertz and the 26 S Ds power exceeded from the electrical baseline, i.e., the zero line). For every MER signal acquisition(MER with STN-DBS), the extended portion set free of horse-jump noise-artifacts(distortions, blur, etc.) as well as biological-amplifier (op-amp instrumentation but the impedance was increased up to 300 Meg Ohms were inferred or deduced, eliminating those signal-acquisitions through artifact-free segments that were less than 5Seconds.

Results

The intra operative micro lead electrode signals were acquired through macro stimulation (i.e., macrosimulation) and micro electrodes recording (MER) was performed through micro-stimulation and both the techniques through deep brain stimulation, i.e., DBS during the bilateral STN DBS surgical procedural process. We took intra op recordings during the deep brain surgery of 12 advanced idiopathic Parkinson`s disease bilateral sub thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN—DBS) patients male ratio:58.1±2.6 years-old). The disease duration was 13.8± 1.9/ mean age at the onset years, through the pre op UPDRS scale (part/stage-III) score of 18.9 ±1.6 during the DBS is in the ON state (DBS ON) as well as 38.5±2.4 during the DBS in the OFF state (i.e., DBS OFF). As the directly pointing the electrodes were innovative progressively in the direction of the pre-op-target, seeFigure 1 . (A) and (B), we recognized the sub thalamic nuclei s p i k i n g - a c t i v i t y for 3.75±0.19mm in to the 66 of the complete 115-trajectories.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the longitudinal topography of β-H.F.O and 8Hz–30Hz in relatively to the exact and specific electro physiological (i.e., electrophysiological signals acquired through MER system for the signature patterns of STN) limits of nuclei. Protuberant and protruding and projecting β-fluctuations (i.e., oscillations of local field electrical β-potentials) occur in neural biomarkers acquisitions of the sub thalamic nucleus Parkinson`s during the DBS is in OFF state (i.e., DBS-OFF) and these oscillations have an effect on the progressive and temporal dynamics of HFOs and single neurons. This study enlightened on the MER with bilateral STN DBS in advanced idiopathic Parkinson`s disease patients. Further experimental analysis will be discussed in our next article with more findings

Source of Funding

No funding or grant support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

1 

MD Hernán CM Fernando J Otárola R Rojas O Alarcón L Cañete EEG Beta band frequency domain evaluation for assessing stress and anxiety in resting, eyes closed, basal conditionsProcedia Computer Sci20191629748110.1016/j.procs.2019.12.075

2 

R Levy P Ashby WD Hutchison AE Lang AM Lozano JO Dostrovsky Dependence of subthalamic nucleus oscillations on movement and dopamine in Parkinson’s diseaseBrain20021256119620910.1093/brain/awf128

3 

A Eusebio W Thevathasan Deep brain stimulation can suppress pathological synchronisation in parkinsonian patientsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr20118256973

4 

IY Andrew N Vanegas C Lungu KA Zaghloul Beta-Coupled High-Frequency Activity and Beta-Locked Neuronal Spiking in the Subthalamic Nucleus of Parkinson's DiseaseJ Neurosci20143438128162710.1523/JNEUROSCI.1895-14.2014

5 

P Brown A Oliviero P Mazzone A Insola P Tonali, V Di Lazzaro Dopamine dependency of oscillations between subthalamic nucleus and pallidum in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosci20012131033810.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-03-01033.2001

6 

G Foffani A Priori M Egidi P Rampini F Tamma E Caputo 300-Hz subthalamic oscillations in Parkin- son’s diseaseBrain20031261021536310.1093/brain/awg229

7 

M Cassidy P Mazzone A Oliviero A Insola P Tonali VD Lazzaro Movement-related changes in synchronization in the human basal gangliaBrain2002125612354610.1093/brain/awf135

8 

A G Androulidakis AA Kühn CC Chen P Blomstedt F Kempf A Kupsch Dopaminergic therapy promotes lateralized motor activity in the subthalamic area in Parkinson’s diseaseBrain200713024576810.1093/brain/awl358

9 

J López-Azcárate M Tainta MC Rodríguez-Oroz M Valencia R González J Guridi Coupling be- tween beta and high-frequency activity in the human subthalamic nucleus may be a pathophysiological mechanism in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosci2010301966677710.1523/JNEUROSCI.5459-09.2010

10 

JW Mink The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programsProg Neurobiol199650438142510.1016/s0301-0082(96)00042-1

11 

A Quiroga-Varela JR Walters E Brazhnik C Marin JA Obeso What basal ganglia changes underlie the parkinsonian state? The significance of neuronal oscillatory activityNeurobiol Dis201358242810.1016/j.nbd.2013.05.010

12 

J S Brittain P Brown Oscillations and the basal ganglia: motor control and beyondNeuroimage20148526374710.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.084

13 

R Levy WD Hutchison AM Lozano JO Dostrovsky High-frequency synchronization of neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of parkinsonian patients with limb tremorJ Neurosci2000202077667510.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-20-07766.2000

14 

A Priori G Foffani A Pesenti F Tamma AM Bianchi M Pellegrini Rhythm-specific pharmacological modulation of subthalamic activity in Parkinson’s diseaseExp Neurology200418923697910.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.001

15 

S Marceglia G Foffani AM Bianchi G Baselli F Tamma M Egidi Dopamine-dependent non-linear correlation between subtha- lamic rhythms in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Physiol200657135799110.1113/jphysiol.2005.100271

16 

A Ku¨hn The relationship between local field potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s diseaseExp Neurol200519412122010.1016/j.expneurol.2005.02.010

17 

M Weinberger N Mahant WD Hutchison AM Lozano E Moro M Hodaie Beta oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus and its relation to dopaminergic response in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurophysiol200696632485610.1152/jn.00697.2006

18 

M Weinberger WD Hutchison AM Lozano M Hodaie JO Dostrovsky Increased gamma oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus during tremor in Parkinson’s disease patientsJ Neurophysiol2009101278980210.1152/jn.90837.2008

19 

A Moran H Bergman Z Israel I Bar-Gad Subthalamic nucleus functional organization revealed by parkinsonian neuronal oscillations and synchronyBrain200813112339540910.1093/brain/awn270



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 15-05-2022

Accepted : 19-06-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.035


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 731

PDF Downloaded: 314