Get Permission Motlekar, Singh, Khapoliwala, and Dahiya: Effectiveness and safety of intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: Results of a single centre study


Background

Stroke is an important health problem worldwide with significant contribution of cases from developing countries.1 In India, it is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality.2 Uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, smoking and dyslipidemia are the common risk factors for stroke. 1

Thrombolytic therapy plays a key role in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke for reducing disability.3 The objective of using thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke is recanalization of the blocked blood vessel.4 Intravenous thrombolysis is approved 5 and practiced worldwide. Intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis both are commonly practiced in India.2 However, thrombolytic therapy is not possible in all patients1 because of late reporting of the patients for treatment after symptom onset. Moreover, many centers are not quipped to administer thrombolytic agents for patients with stroke. 5

Those who receive timely treatment show favourable results. A study in Indian patients showed favourable outcomes at three months in 67.1% thrombolyzed patients. Intravenous thrombolysis has become a standard treatment in eligible patients presenting within this time window of 4.5 h. 6

Intravenous alteplase i.e., recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is commonly used thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stoke. Use of alteplase up to 4.5 hours from the onset of clinical symptoms of acute ischemic stroke provides beneficial effects. 3 A study from India (n=97) showed mean onset to needle time of 177.2 min. 6

The data on effectiveness of intravenous alteplase in the treatment of ischemic stroke in Indian patients are limited.

The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of intravenous alteplase (tPA) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective observational study, adult patients (>18 years of age) with ischemic stroke causing measurable deficit and time of symptom onset to potential treatment of less than three hours and admitted in the hospital from 2015 to 2017 were included. Patients with significant head injury or prior stroke in previous 3 months, symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage, history of arterial puncture at a non-compressible site within previous 7 days, history of previous intracranial haemorrhage, history of intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, recent intracranial or intraspinal surgery, elevated blood pressure (systolic >185 mm Hg or diastolic >110 mm Hg), active internal bleeding, acute bleeding diathesis including but not limited to platelet count less than 100,000/mm3, use of heparin in the previous 48 hours, resulting in abnormally elevated aPTT greater than the upper limit of normal, current use of anticoagulant with INR >1.7 or PT >15, current use of direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g. dabigatran) or factor Xa inhibitors (e.g. rivaroxaban, apixaban) with elevated sensitive laboratory tests (such as aPTT, INR, platelet count, and ECT; TT; dabigatran level; or appropriate factor Xa activity assays), blood glucose less than 50 mg/dl, CT demonstrating multilobar infarction (hypodensity >1/3 cerebral hemisphere) were excluded from the current study. The relative contraindications for use of IV tPA were only minor or rapidly improving stroke symptoms (clearing spontaneously), pregnancy, seizure at onset with postictal neurological impairments, history of major surgery or serious trauma within the preceding 14 days, recent gastrointestinal or urinary tract haemorrhage (within 21 days) or history of acute myocardial infarction in previous 3 months. If the time of symptom onset to potential treatment was 3 to 4.5 hours, additional exclusion criteria included patients with age more than 80 years of age, severe stroke (NIHS score more than 25), taking an oral anticoagulant regardless of INR or history of diabetes and prior ischemic stroke.

Alteplase was administered as per the approved dosage i.e., 0.9 mg/kg (not more than 90 mg total dose) infused intravenously over 60 minutes with 10% of the total dose administered as an initial bolus.

Patients were evaluated for severity of condition with NIH stroke scale at baseline, 2 hours, 24 hours and 7 days. The scores for all 11 sub-points were recorded at all these time points. Improvement was assessed by evaluating total NIH stroke score7 at different time points.

Based on the neurological assessment, patients were categorised into three categories: unchanged (U), improving (I) and deteriorating (D). Blood pressure was closely monitored until 24 hours after infusion of alteplase. Both neurological assessment and blood pressure was monitored every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours after start of infusion then every 30 minutes for next 6 hours and hourly from the post infusion hour until 24 hours after infusion.

Statistical analysis

The collected data from the case report forms was entered in the Microsoft Excel sheet for analysis. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation whereas categorical variables are presented as number and percentages. ANOVA test was used to examine difference in the NIH stroke score at different time points. Paired t test was used to test significance in the NIH stroke score and blood pressure at different time points. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 26 patients were enrolled in this study. The study population consisted of 10 (38.50%) female and 16 (61.50%) male patients (Table 1).

Minimum and maximum age of patient in the study cohort was 34 years and 86 years respectively. Fifty percentage patients were less than 60 years of age and above 60 years each. Readings of blood glucose level were available in 20 patients with mean level 142.05 (+46.71) mg/dl (range 63-240 mg/dl).

The NIHS score for individual parameters and total score before treatment, at 2 hours, 24 hours and 7 days is given in Figure 1. Total NIHS score reduced from 10.77 (+5.01) at pre-treatment to 4.04 (+4.00) at 7 days. The improvement in NIHS score at two hours versus pre-treatment (p<0.001), at 24 hours versus 2 hours (p=0.002) and 7 days versus 24 hours (p<0.001) was statistically significant.

For level of consciousness, orientation, limb ataxia and sensory function there was no significant difference in the NIHS score of pre-treatment versus 2 hours, 2 hours versus 24 hours and 24 hours versus 7 days (Table 2). For commands, the NIHS score significantly improved at 2 hours as compared to pre-treatment score (p=0.043), but the difference between 2 hours versus 24 hours (0.0327) and 24 hour versus 7 days was not significant (p=1.000). Best gaze and visual field score significantly improved at 2 hours compared to pre-treatment. Difference between 24 hours versus 2 hours was also significant for both parameters. For facial paresis, the difference was significant at 24 hours versus 2 hours (p=0.011) and 7 days versus 24 hours (p=0.042). Motor function of arm and leg significantly improved at 7 days versus 24 hours (p=0.008 and p=0.001 respectively). Best language and speech score significantly improved at 2 hours compared to pre-treatment (p=0.016 and p=0.006 respectively).

Systolic blood pressure did not show significant change at most time points till 24 hours except at 30 minutes compared to 15 minutes (p=0.024). Similarly, diastolic blood pressure also was stable at most time points till 24 hours except at 11 to 13 hours (Table 2).

Overall status of patient at different time points is shown in table 3. At 1 hour, 52% patients showed improved status whereas at the end of 6 hours, 37.5% patients had improved status. After 24 hours, 40% patients showed improved status whereas in remaining 60% patients, status was unchanged.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Parameter

Result

Male n (%)

16 (61.50%)

Female n (%)

10 (38.5%)

Mean (+SD) age in years (overall) (n=26)

58.59 (+13.77)

Mean (+SD) age of males in years (n=16)

61.50 (15.23)

Mean (+SD) age of females in years (n=10)

56.56 (13.12)

Mean blood sugar level (n=20)

142.05 (+46.71)

Table 2

Time point-wise analysis of blood pressure

Time points

Mean (+SD) systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

Mean (+SD) diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

Comparison

P-value (Systolic blood pressure)

P-value (Diastolic blood pressure)

15 min (n=23)

155.65 (+28.26)

92.17 (+11.26)

-

-

-

30 min (n=23)

150.87 (+26.95)

90.00 (+12.06)

15 min vs 30 min

0.024

0.057

45 min (n=23)

152.17 (+22.15)

89.35 (+13.68)

30 min vs 45 min

0.665

0.741

60 min (n=23)

151.00 (+21.24)

88.09 (+12.16)

45 min vs 60 min

0.581

0.497

1 hr 15 min (n=23)

150.00 (+20.89)

89.57 (+13.31)

60 min Vs 1hr 15 min

0.635

0.413

1 hr 30 min (n=23)

148.26 (+19.92)

90.00 (+12.06)

1hr 15 vs 1hr 30 min

0.357

0.770

1 hr 45 min (n=23)

146.52 (+20.14)

89.13 (+14.11)

1hr 30 min vs 1hr 45 min

0.528

0.492

2 hr (n=23)

146.52 (+19.21)

86.96 (+12.59)

1hr 45 min vs 2hr

1.00

0.135

2.5 hr (n=23)

146.96 (+14.90)

88.70 (+11.00)

2hr vs 2.5 hr

0.883

0.383

3 hr (n=23)

147.39 (+13.56)

86.09 (+11.18)

2.5hr vs 3 hr

0.770

0.056

3.5 hr (n=23)

145.65 (+15.02)

89.13 (+11.64)

3hr vs 3.5 hr

0.445

0.184

4 hr (n=23)

143.91 (+18.03)

86.52 (+10.27)

3.5hr vs 4 hr

0.328

0.162

4.5 hr (n=22)

143.18 (+17.29)

85.91 (+7.96)

4hr vs 4.5 hr

0.296

0.504

5 hr (n=22)

142.27 (+13.07)

85.45 (+8.00)

4.5hr vs 5 hr

0.628

0.747

5.5 hr (n=22)

143.91 (+15.02)

85.91 (+7.96)

5hr vs 5.5 hr

0.406

0.771

6 hrs (n=22)

144.09 (+12.97)

85.00 (+7.40)

5.5hr vs 6 hr

0.408

0.492

6.5 hr (n=22)

143.18 (+15.24)

83.18 (+8.94)

6hr vs 6.5 hr

0.576

0.329

7 hr (n=22)

144.09 (+14.36)

84.55 (+7.39)

6.5hr vs 7 hr

0.492

0.451

7.5 hr (n=22)

144.09 (+14.03)

82.27 (+6.85)

7hr vs 7.5 hr

1.000

0.135

8 hr (n=22)

144.55 (+14.71)

84.09 (+7.96)

7.5hr vs 8 hr

0.771

0.257

9 hr (n=22)

141.82 (+15.63)

84.09 (+9.59)

8hr vs 9 hr

0.186

1.000

10 hr (n=21)

141.90 (+14.70)

82.38 (+8.89)

9hr vs 10 hr

1.000

0.379

11 hr (n=22)

140.45 (+16.47)

85.45 (+8.00)

10hr vs 11 hr

0.452

0.110

12 hr (n=21)

139.52 (+18.84)

81.43 (+7.93)

11hr vs 12 hr

0.705

0.009

13 hr (n=22)

139.09 (+18.49)

85.00 (+9.13)

12hr vs 13 hr

0.789

0.042

14 hr (n=20)

140.50 (+16.69)

83.50 (+9.88)

13hr vs 14 hr

0.234

0.591

15 hr (n=22)

140.91 (+15.71)

83.64 (+7.90)

14hr vs 15 hr

0.494

1.000

16 hr (n=20)

140.00 (+17.77)

83.50 (+9.33)

15hr vs 16 hr

0.825

1.000

17 hr (n=22)

138.64 (+18.33)

82.27 (+7.52)

16hr vs 17 hr

0.481

0.453

18 hr (n=20)

138.50 (+15.31)

82.00 (+9.51)

17hr vs 18 hr

1.000

1.000

19 hr (n=22)

138.64 (+13.90)

81.82 (+7.33)

18hr vs 19 hr

0.789

0.748

20 hr (n=20)

138.50 (+15.99)

83.00 (+9.79)

19hr vs 20 hr

0.748

0.419

21 hr (n=22)

138.64 (+17.54)

80.91 (+11.09)

20hr vs 21 hr

0.815

0.090

22 hr (n=20)

135.50 (+17.61)

79.00 (+9.12)

21hr vs 22 hr

0.330

0.716

23 hr (n=22)

137.73 (+17.71)

80.91 (+11.09)

22hr vs 23 hr

0.297

0.494

24 hr (n=20)

136.00 (+19.84)

81.50 (+10.40)

23hr vs 24 hr

0.186

0.330

Table 3

Time

Improved n (%)

Unchanged n (%)

Deteriorated n (%)

15 min (n=25)

3 (12%)

22 (88%)

0

30 min (n=25)

5 (20%)

20 (80%)

0

45 min (n=25)

9 (36%)

14 (56%)

2 (8%)

1 hr (n=25)

13 (52%)

11 (44%)

1 (4%)

1.15 hr (n=25)

11 (44%)

12 (48%)

2 (8%)

1.30 hr (n=25)

8 (32%)

14 (56%)

3 (12%)

1.45 hr (n=25)

4 (12%)

18 (54%)

3 (12%)

2 hr (n=25)

5 (20%)

17 (68%)

3 (12%)

2.5 hr (n=25)

10 (40%)

13 (52%)

2 (8%)

3 hr (n=25)

9 (36%)

16 (64%)

0

3.5 hr (n=25)

7 (28%)

18 (72%)

0

4 hr (n=25)

6 (24%)

19 (76%)

0

4.5 hr (n=25)

6 (24%)

19 (76%)

0

5 hr (n=25)

5 (20%)

18 (72%)

2 (8%)

5.5 hr (n=24)

6 (25%)

15 (62.5%)

3 (12.5%)

6 hr (n=24)

9 (37.5%)

13 (54.17%)

2 (8.33%)

6.5 hr (n=24)

8 (33.33%)

16 (66.67%)

0

7 hr (n=24)

4 (16.67%)

20 (83.33%)

0

7.5 hr (n=24)

9 (37.5%)

15 (62.5%)

0

8 hr (n=24)

7 (29.17%)

17 (70.83%)

0

9 hr (n=25)

10 (40%)

14 (56%)

1 (4%)

10 hr (n=25)

7 (28%)

17 (68%)

1 (4%)

11 hr (n=24)

10 (41.67%)

13 (54.17%)

1 (4.17%)

12 hr (n=24)

11 (45.83%)

13 (54.17%)

0

13 hr (n=24)

8 (33.33%)

16 (66.67%)

0

14 hr (n=23)

7 (30.43%)

16 (69.56%)

0

15 hr (n=23)

6 (26.09%)

16 (69.57%)

1 (4.35%)

16 hr (n=23)

8 (34.78%)

15 (65.22%)

0

17 hr (n=23)

8 (34.78%)

15 (65.22%)

0

18 hr (n=23)

8 (34.78%)

15 (65.22%)

0

19 hr (n=23)

3 (13.04%)

20 (86.96%)

0

20 hr (n=24)

4 (16.7%)

20 (83.3%)

0

21 hr (n=24)

6 (25%)

18 (75%)

0

22 hr (n=25)

9 (36%)

16 (64%)

0

23 hr (n=25)

10 (40%)

15 (60%)

0

24 hr (n=25)

10 (40%)

15 (60%)

0

Figure 1

NIHS score for individual parameters and total NIHS score at different time points

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/4407d762-39cc-499d-bc61-f05dde41ce05image1.png

Discussion

Thrombolytic therapy represents an important intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke because of its efficacy. 8, 9, 10 A Cochrane review has shown that thrombolytic therapy given up to six hours after stroke shows beneficial effects. Treatment within first three hours provide more benefits than treatment given later. 11

In this study we evaluated efficacy and safety of tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Overall, intravenous rtPA (alteplase) was found to be effective in reducing NIHSS score from baseline to 7 days. The difference in the score was statistically significant at all evaluated time-points. The results indicate the beneficial effects of early thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Studies showing impact of intravenous thrombolysis on individual NIHS scale items are limited. In this regard, our study provides significant insights. For commands, best gaze, visual field, best language, speech and extinction and inattention (neglect) simultaneous stimulation with visual and tactile stimulus scores significantly improved at 2 hours compared to pre-treatment. Timely thrombolysis seems to have early effect on these functions. Motor function of arm and leg significantly improved at 7 days versus 24 hours. As reported in the literature, 12 intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator in our study was found to be effective and useful in most patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting within the suitable time window.

Significant increase in blood pressure is common in patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis. 13 In the SAMURAI rt-PA registry, early variations in systolic blood pressure were shown to be positively associated with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death in patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis. 14 Similarly, a retrospective analysis suggested that in patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator for stroke, absence of hypertension at the time presentation does not preclude the risk of rise in blood pressure. Therefore, control of blood pressure control is very important in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator for ischemic stroke. It is recommended be monitored every 15 minutes to 1 hour for 24 hours in these patients. 15 In this study, we evaluated efficacy of intravenous alteplase with close observation of blood pressure. We also evaluated the status of patients at different time points till 24 hours after administration of alteplase. In our study, there were no clinically significant fluctuations in the blood pressure till 24 hours. It is reported that if there is no increase in blood pressure during the first 6 hours, subsequent hypertension over the next 18 hours is unlikely.

Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke is associated with risk of brain haemorrhage in about five to ten percentage of patients and it can be fatal.5 Considering this risk, tissue plasminogen activator should be administered carefully after analysing its risk benefit ratio. 16 In our study, intravenous alteplase was well tolerated without intracranial bleeding or other significant complications.

Hyperglycemia and intracranial haemorrhage are shown to be independent predictors of hyperacute worsening in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving thrombolysis. 17 Hence, reducing risk of bleeding in hyperglycemic setting is important. 18 In our study, maximum blood glucose in one patient was 240 mg/dl. Hyperglycemia was not of a concern in our study patients.

A study (n=201) in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving thrombolysis within 6 hours of symptom onset showed worsening in 13% patients after 24 hours. Improvement and unchanged status were observed in 39% and 48% patients after 24 hours of thrombolysis. 17 The percentage of patients showing improvement was similar in our study. Another report also suggested improvement (i.e., NIHS score <4) in 41% patients at day 7. 19

As reported in other studies, 20 our results suggest that alteplase is effective and safe for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

In our study, thrombolysis was well tolerated. No life-threatening or major bleeding complications were observed in any patients.

Small sample size and single centre data are the limitations of our study. Larger studies would add to existing data.

Conclusion

Intravenous alteplase is effective and safe treatment approach for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. No life-threatening bleeding complications were observed in any patient. There were no clinically significant changes in blood pressure till 24 hours.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest with regards to the publication of this research review article.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

T K Banerjee S K Das Fifty years of stroke researches in IndiaAnn Indian Acad Neurol20161911810.4103/0972-2327.168631

2 

J D Pandian P Sudhan Stroke epidemiology and stroke care services in IndiaJ Stroke20131531283410.5853/jos.2013.15.3.128

3 

T Robinson Z Zaheer A K Mistri Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: An updateTher Adv Chronic Dis2011221193110.1177/2040622310394032

4 

J F Kirmani A Alkawi S Panezai M Gizzi Advances in thrombolytics for treatment of acute ischemic strokeNeurology2012791311925

5 

A J Furlan I L Katzan L R Caplan Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic strokeCurr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med2003531718010.1007/s11936-003-0001-4

6 

A Mehta R Mahale K Buddaraju A Majeed S Sharma M Javali Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Review of 97 PatientsJ Neurosci Rural Pract201781384310.4103/0976-3147.193558

7 

Know stroke know the signs. Act in time. NIH Stroke Scalewww.ninds.nih.gov

8 

N C Suwanwela K Phanthumchinda Y Likitiaroen Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke in Asia: The first prospective evaluationClin Neurol Neurosurg200610865495210.1016/j.clineuro.2005.09.008

9 

K Overgaard B Sperling G Bovsen H Pedersen J Gam K Ellemann Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. A Danish pilot studyStroke1993241014394610.1161/01.str.24.10.1439

10 

V Padma M Fisher M Moonis Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: 3 h and beyondExpert Rev Neurother2005522233310.1586/14737175.5.2.223

11 

JM Wardlaw V Murray E Berge GJ Del Zoppo Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic strokeCochrane Database Syst Rev201420147CD00021310.1002/14651858.CD000213

12 

G Tsivgoulis O Kargiotis A V Alexandrov Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a bridge between two centuriesExpert Rev Neurother20171788193710.1080/14737175.2017.1347039

13 

L Kellert A Rocco M Sykora W Hacke PA Ringleb Frequency of increased blood pressure levels during systemic thrombolysis and risk of intracerebral haemorrhageStroke20114261702610.1161/STROKEAHA.110.604744

14 

K Endo K Kario J Nakagawara Y Shiokawa H Yamagami E Furui Impact of early blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis. The SAMURAI rt-PA registryStroke2013443816810.1161/STROKEAHA.112.681007

15 

V Aiyagari A Gujjar A R Zazuvlia M N Diringer Hourly blood pressure monitoring after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for ischemic stroke. Does everyone need it?Stroke2004351023263010.1161/01.STR.0000141937.80760.10

16 

Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Committee on Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic strokeCJEM200131812

17 

R Leigh O O Zaidat M F Suri G Lynch S Sundararajan J L Sunshine Predictors of hyperacute clinical worsening in ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolytic therapyStroke20043581903710.1161/01.STR.0000132571.77987.4c

18 

S Hafez M Coucha A Bruno S C Fagan A Ergul Hyperglycemia, acute ischemic stroke, and thrombolytic therapyTransl Stroke Res2014544425310.1007/s12975-014-0336-z

19 

M Roje-Bedekovic V Vargek-Solter L Coric K Sabolek T Breitendeld V Supanc Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke-our experiences as part of SITS-MOSTActa Clin Croat200948328793

20 

M D Hill A M Buchan Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study (CASES) Investigators. Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: results of the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness StudyCMAJ20051721013071210.1503/cmaj.1041561



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 08-07-2022

Accepted : 23-08-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.033


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 737

PDF Downloaded: 333