Get Permission Raju: Subthalamic nucleus projection by SVM based MER Data via deep brain stimulation: A study of spike uncovering


Introduction

Parkinson`s disease (PD) is a brain disorder with distinct molecular, functional, and structural features. It is the complex neurodegenerative disease of the brain that causes tremors, particularly in the elderly–matured, which is, differentiated by the convolution of cardinal motoric-symptoms or feature manifestations, namely, tremor, Bradykinesia/akinesia (slowness of movement, i.e., absence, delay in initiation), rigidity and postural instability. Though clinical-diagnosis and benefits of deep-brain-stimulation (DBS) in subthalamic-nuclei (STN, or s-nuclei) have been established, albeit, how its mechanisms augment motoric-symptoms principally reducing-tremors and motor-fluctuations and restoring and/or increasing motor-functioning have not been fully elucidated.

The STN-DBS was developed as a basic corrective option, is an active therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD)1 when PD motor symptoms such as tremor, rigidity, and Bradykinesia, and postural instability are not preventive by the medication.2 However, its success is impeded by limited and some degree of knowledge of restorative mechanisms and the lack of a robust feedback signal for tailoring induced stimulations. The fundamental outcomes of the induced stimuli are for the progress of these key objective motor symptoms. Parkinson disease and the impact of DBS for ideal prognostic response have been shown to be a complex-system (network) level-impact. 3, 4 But prognostics and computational observations have shown that the success of STN-DBS varies profoundly in setting the DBS electrodes through superior accuracy obsessed by the sensori-motor zone of s-nuclei corresponding to the dorso lateral base portion-of-nucleus. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 The somatotopic scenario of sensori-motor zone in STN plus it is relative to movement and tremor in Parkinson subjects has been highly instituted. 10, 11 MER gives the correction position of the STN and based on MER signal patterns (signatures), the STN is identified and implanted DBS electrodes.

Materials and Methods

52 prospective subjects with Parkinson`s Disease (PD) were incorporated in the study. Subjects with advanced idiopathic PD of 5 years (>=)and Hoehn and Yahr (H and Y) score of 4( <=) with normal cognition were eligible for surgery. Probable subjects who were wheelchair or bed bound, had cognitive impairment/dementia (IC/CD) or severe psychiatric disturbances were excluded. Surgery was planned by applying a Cosman–Roberts–Wells (CRW) (Integra, Burlington, MA, USA) fixed stereotactic frame was set over the subjects head devoid of the transdermic transcutaneous screw obsession which would be necessary in the physical-setting. CRW head frame applied for inflexible fixation (obsession to head-skull(cranium)) for stereo tactic functional-neurosurgery. The frame was fixed to cranium via 4 screws positioned across graphite-posts. Exterior crate, i.e., cage was served as a MR localizer for image registration. The subjects were then positioned in a horizontal (i.e.,-supine) point, including the C.R.W frame firmly fixed to the couch.

The following Figure 1 showing the various stages of the DBS surgical procedure right from the MRI image transformations onto computer operating room via wireless internet, STN-DBS electrode implantation and MER signals recording.

Figure 1

Implantation of electrode: A complete MER with STN-DBS approach

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c2412a15-98bd-4fa4-810c-3a3db8e702b0image1.png

A 7 Tesla MRI protocol using Frame link software with multi channels (a core pentode electrode consists of 5 electrodes arranged in an array) maximum 5 channel electrode. Microelectrode recording was performed in all subjects extending from 10 mm above target to 10 mm below STN ( maximum positive+Ve to maximum negative-Ve peak, i.e.,  going upto ±10mm). Final target selection was based on the effects and side effects of macro stimulation and confirmed by post-operative MRI.

The subjects mean age was 58.1±9.1 years, mean disease duration was 8.8±3.64 years. Prior to implantation of the DBS electrodes, the mean UPDRS scale stage III+ score in 'off' state was 52.7±10.6 and in 'on' state was 13.4 ± 5.0. Sub thalamic nuclei (STN) microelectrode recordings (MER) were detected in a mean of 3.5±1.1 channels on the right hemisphere side and 3.6 ±1.04 on the left hemisphere side. Final channel selected were most commonly central seen in 42.3% followed by anterior in 33.7%. Concordance of final track with the channel having the highest recording was 58.7%, with the channel showing maximum depth of recording was 48% and with either was 64%. Absence of any recording in the final tract chosen was seen in 6.52%, in these subjects, the tract was preferred based on stimulus results. The intensity of the electrodes were detected through the microelectrode (MER) recordings in 75.6%.

DBS Surgery

Based on the CRW frame, the skull was drilled, and 5 microelectrodes were introduced into the brain over five channels -central anterior (front), posterior (back), medial (near midline) and lateral (away from midline). Recording was started from 10 mm above the target determined by the MRI and is extended 10 mm below.

Then stimulation was done with 130Hz, 70 microsecond pulse width and response were seen with increasing amplitude. Whichever channel shows the best response, that is chosen. The first level of MER recording was used to determine the depth of DBS electrode placement - that is if recording starts at -5 level, the lead was placed from that level.

Intra-operative recording was accomplished in all 5 channels. All the five microelectrodes were gradually passed through the STN, and recording was performed from 10mm above to 10mm below (maximum positive +Ve to maximum negative -Ve peak, i.e., going up to ±10mm) the STN was computed on the 7 Tesla functional-MRI.

The channel with maximum recording and the earliest recording was acquired on two sides. Intra operative test stimuli was achieved in all channels from the level at the onset of MER recording. Stimulation was done at 1mv, 3mv to assess the progress in the motoric symptoms, tremor, bradykinesia, and in rigidity. Occurrence of dyskinesias were correlated with precise targeting. Dyskinesias were evaluated at 5mv and 7mv to guarantee that the final channel selected had highest progress in conjunction with least side effects. Correlation was measured amongst the characteristics of MER and the final channel selected in 52 PD subjects (104 sides). The pulse-width was set for 60μSeconds for the duration at 130Hz, and the current-voltage was accustomed to the singular subject. Institute ethical approval was done following the Helsinki affirmation and principles(1975) and the subjects were informed their consent and written permission obtained for their anonymized data to deduce the inferences and for conclusions drawn for the analysis purpose.

A support vector machine (SVM)-based microelectrode recording (MER) system (Medtronic) for acquiring the signals of S.T.N neurons (MER signals with bilateral STN-DBS) was applied.

Microeelctrode Recording

The microelectrode signals of sub thalamic nucleus neurons of Parkinson`s were recorded from every electrode of pentode microelectrode set which consists of 5 micro electrodes in an array and for two sides separately, implanted in either side (bilateral: right and left hemispheres) of PD brain. MER signals digital data was acquired concurrently from all electrodes arranged in standard Ben’s Gun pattern in every hemi sphere (HS) for approximately and virtually 30seconds (mean recording time for the entire cohort was 42.20 ±7.43seconds) with a sampling rate of 24kiloHz. Due to aliasing and heavy ripples, i.e., oscillations, 24kHz sampling rate was used. Contemplating the object site (target-location) at 0mm, MER recordings were acquired from every point at 1mm microrecording movement-steps (i.e.,depths) signal intensities, 10mm directly above the abaxial (dorsal)border plus 4mm further down the target s-nuclei. A micro electrode can detect the variations in the extra cellular field triggered by the electric-current-flows from the neighboring neuron and from other adjacent neural-cells[. For extra cellular intra operative MER acquisition recordings, spikes are usually detected as digital signals (current-voltage) which surpass a limit, the features and specifics of distinct varieties of spikes and their instigation has been explored.12, 13

The segmentation (separation was performed as follows in an algorithmic step-wise procedure

Step#1: The examined data was partitioned into just as long non-overlapping sections of length 0.5seconds (Table 1).

We achieved a vector s = (s[1],s[2]…s[l]) of non- overlapping segments.

MER Data analysis

The microrecording (MER) signal spikes were detected by applying the “script” and “wave clue” inbuilt in functions from Mat-Lab tools and micro electrode recording data was investigated by applying the customized MATLAB offline programming tools. The MER data followed by the analysis were ghettoized into the three components to excerpt dissimilar parameters of interest. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

Noise removal

The unwanted signals are usually referred to as the “artefacts” (noise components from various sources such as user, instrument, external power lines/mains lines frequencies, etc.). A C components (and D C components as well), user equipment’s/various surgical-components pertaining to DBS surgery, instrument noise, patient movement and other exogenous noises as well. The acquired micro recording signals of STN data was lowered to 30seconds measurement for every subject participated in this study and was subjected to separation for eliminating exogenous unwanted noised components. Data separation is a procedure of splitting the data into ‘n’ number of epochs—which is a process of extracting explicit and precise (unambiguous) time-windows from the continuous real signal. Discrete and distinct epochs were then examined scrutinized for the occurrence of existence of noisy data and the same was removed. To prevent the noise due to concatenation of non-adjacent epochs we interjected the epochs with Piecewise Cubic Hermit Interpolating Polynomial (“PC-CHIP”) process/technique.16, 28 Through separation, the micro recording signals of STN data was splitted into non-overlapping epochs of 0.5Seconds and was arranged in an array of vector: S = [s(1), s(2), s(3),…, s(l)], [s(1), s(2), s(3),…, s(l)], are non-overlapping epochs of micro recording data-vector-“S”.

The observed data was segmented into equally long non-overlapping segments of distance 0.5 seconds (Table 1).

Table 1

serdefined variables: Separation of the data into non-overlapping segments

User-identified variables

Variable quantity chosen

region measurement (s)

0.5

key-level (threshold) value

1.8

Identification of the spike

The technique applied for spike detection could be divided into three main steps—spike-sorting and spike-detection, choice of spike-features followed by the clustering of certain spike features. The details of this method have been explained in detail previously by Falkenberg et.al.,29 and Quiroga et.al.,30 however, we state here very concisely. Initially, a band pass digital filter with 0.5kHz and 5kHz (utilizing fourth order Butterworth filter) was applied to filter the higher-signal strength, low frequency activity envisaging the spikes.31

The MER signals of STN spike detections and the separation modules are schematically shown inFigure 2, Figure 3.

Figure 2

2: Raw MER signal

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c2412a15-98bd-4fa4-810c-3a3db8e702b0image2.png
Figure 3

Modules

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/c2412a15-98bd-4fa4-810c-3a3db8e702b0image3.png

Through the circumstantial-background activity, we have processed the parameters to examine the oscillating/fluctuatery-features of the acquired signal-waveform. Preceding investigations have shown that basal-ganglia-circuit activity in Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders entails improve in FR, a propensity in the direction of exploding plus irregular synchronization in the STN neurons. These irregularities and also correlation to the effect of stimuli has been detected in several bands-frequencies. Thus, we have computed the spectral-estimations, namely, amplitude-mean (AM), maximum-peak of the signal (MPoS), i.e., power of the signal root mean square (RMS), in the following bands-frequencies range: typical-low-frequency from 2Hz to 7Hz, α from 8Hz to 12Hz, β-band (sub divided as low-point short_ β, i.e., from 13Hz to 20Hz, high-level superior- β from 21Hz to 30Hz and γ-band from 31Hz to 49 Hz by applying the power-spectral-density (PDF) through the technique of Welch.

The Focal (locus) point of the Foci (or Nuclei) and its estimation: Throughout the DBS functional- neurosurgery, the coordinates for anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) were defined and modified to the coordinates of sub thalamic nuclei neurons through straight conception, which is in general 11.5mm lateral, 3mm posterior and 3mm caudal in relation to Middle of AC - PC. Thus, defined and the customized intensity is deemed or judged to be the accurate target intensity in our—study. Moreover, dorso-lateral territory of the nuclei which was exclusively defined for every PD-subject by applying experimental and DBS surgical-procedure, is the object, i.e., the target point and hence is judged as the acceptable implant spot. The best possible object place and intensity for the pentode-electrodes were validated more by estimating the Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS) stage III score pre-operative (pre-op) prior to seven days and post operative (post-op) following ninety (90) days. Just those individual PD subjects were deemed in the study who were considerably advanced UPDRS-stage-III progress of more than 75%, through the prescription following the DBS surgical-operation.

The parameters were computed in support of the aimed at MER signals of STN data acquired at various complexities from 10mm above and 4mm below the target nucleus. The computed parameters were then utilized for the estimate of implant spot plus appropriate intensity then for the contrast through the findings from eye-visual-examination. Therefore, the underlying hypothesis being, intensities at which these parameters are examined to have relatively superior-amplitudes assessed to more stimulus-intensities, reminiscent of the eye-visual-examination and is the object-stimulus-point in nuclei, i.e.,STN. Therefore, the finding precision is computed based on the number of times achieved parameters determined-value and quantifiable-object target corresponds or matches. At this juncture, an intelligent neuro-electro-physiologist skilled in Parkinson`s disease and movement disorders examined the spike-rate(SR) attentively and visually (SRV/VSR) for the intent of contrast or evaluation. Furthermore, the parameters achieved within the object site were associated additionally through scientific-experimental (clinical) parameters utilizing the Pearson`s correlation-coefficient (p-value typically 0.05,   =0.05 is sgnificant statistically) for defining the sensori-motor dissection of the sub thalamic nuclei. The manifold evaluation improvement was achieved for all the correlation outcomes for every Parkinson patient of individual and/or separate (separable) variables by employing the Bonferroni-rectification.

Results

52 subjects recruited in this study, the computation was done on sixteen subjects only and the remaining subjects were eliminated by the neurologists as per the objective criteria. Thirty-two sites from sixteen-subjects with bilateral STN-DBS microelectrodes were detected. The mean of the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) Mean Fourier transformed β-band amplitude from the background signal activity in sub thalamic nuclei tallied to the object-target intensity in 82.01% of the Parkinson diseased subjects. While dividing β in at a low level and at greater frequency-bands, shorter  β, i.e.,13Hz to 20Hz was confer to the object intensity through yet better precision in 85.02% of the PD patients. The mean of the γ-band amplitude computed by using the related background-signal activity in substantia nigra pars reticulata paralleled to the object-target intensity (depth) in 86.03%. Likewise, the spikes-rate in nuclei was in correspond to the target-depth in 85.01% plus the number of spikes in substantia-nigra (reticulata) is 99.8% in all Parkinson`s. Amongst other parameters, L.v.R was in consensus to object (target) intensity accurately is 78.11% in all the Parkinson subjects. The following Table 2 gives the computations of 21 parameters values (in %) via background-activity, spikes, inter spike interval and burst index followed by the accuracy of the likelihood estimation (the prediction).

Conclusions

The intra operative microrecording, i.e., MER and computational analysis (computerized assessment) of spiking and contextual-activity in the β-band frequency ranges may possibly advance to appropriate encouraging sign along with a translational-value for the clinical-diagnostic-practice. This study findings demonstrated that spiking-rate was reliable for discovering the object-intensity plus increased β-activity allowed differentiating the STN limits and also distinguish it from adjacent structures especially the most significant substantia nigra pars reticulata. Similarly, the object choice and ultimate (anode cathode) electrode-positioning in the interior s-nuclei based on greater β-band frequency-ranges activity correlates by an enhanced clinical and/or diagnostic result and specifically an enhancement of motoric akinesia symptoms.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

V Rama Raju Edge detections of MER Signals of STN with DBS micro electrode local field potential acquisitions in Parkinson`sIndian J Neurosci2021742816

2 

V Rama Raju Investigation of multi-site micro recordings of subthalamic nucleus neurons using machine learning MER with DBS in Parkinson`s - A simulation studyIndian J Neurosci20217428791

3 

V Rama Raju Stimulus techniques and microelectrode recordings of subthalamic-nuclei neurons in Parkinson‘s during functional-neurosurgeryIP Indian J Anat Surg Head, Neck Brain20217416

4 

V Rama Raju MER Signal Acquisition of STN-DBS Biomarkers in Parkinson`s: A machine learning auto regression approachIndian J Neurosci2021722430

5 

V Rama Raju An advance of complex multifaceted root learning for Parkinson behavior using subthalamic nucleus biomarkersI J Neurosciences2021732316

6 

V Rama Raju D Anji Reddy D Narsimha K Srinivas B Kavitha Rani Adaptive Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulator Coding Techniques for Target Detections in Parkinson’s, Taylor & Francis Production (UK)IETE J Res202111610.1080/03772063.2021.1962742

7 

V Rama Raju D Reddy G Narsimha Deep Brain Stimulator Coding in Parkinson’s: An Evolving Approach, Taylor & Francis Production (UK)IETE J Res202111410.1080/03772063.2021.1950052

8 

A study of the development of aesthetic analogue scale for deep brain stimulus coding to rejuvenate Parkinson`s motor functioningIP Int J Aesthet Health Rejuvenation2020341116

9 

V Rama Raju Computational intelligence in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: Machine learning unsupervised PCA tracking method and clustering techniques for Parkinson’sIP Indian J Neurosci20217216470

10 

V Rama Raju Computational intelligence in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A case study in Parkinson’s disease using machine learning supervised techniquesIndian J Neurosci20217215663

11 

V Rama Raju Implantation of microchips into the subthalamic nucleus neurons of Parkinson’s disease and movement disordersIndian J Neurosci202171848

12 

V Rama Raju Analysis of Parkinson’s diseaseIP Indian J Neurosci20217214855

13 

V Rama Raju Prediction of subthalamic nucleus neural tissue dimensions using high compactness microrecording recording system in Parkinson’s with deep brain stimulationIP Indian J Neurosci2021716775

14 

V Rama Raju Analysis of Parkinson’s disease movement disorder by M E R with S T N - Deep Brain StimulationsIP Indian J Neurosci2021717682

15 

V Rama Raju Statistical analysis of MER data of STN Neurons with DBS in Parkinson‘s movement disordersIP Indian J Neurosci20206431726

16 

V Rama Raju Efficacy of lead point using MER with DBS in accurate targeting for persevering subthalamic-nuclei neurons- geometry of the electrode and its implantation in Parkinson ‘sIP Indian J Neurosci20206430116

17 

V Rama Raju Evaluation of local field potentials of MER data with STN DBS electrodesIP Indian J Neurosci202064296300

18 

V Rama Raju Computational analysis of MER with STN DBS in Parkinson‘s disease using machine learning techniquesIP Indian J Neurosci20206428195

19 

V Rama Raju MER based analysis of local field potentials with deep brain stimulation subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease using coherence and entropy techniquesIP Indian J Neurosci20206320219

20 

V Rama Raju Induced micro lesion effect on cardinal motor features of Parkinson‘s: A study with iMER signals of subthalamic-nuclei deep brain stimulations (Electrode-Implantation) by DBSIp Indian J Neurosci2020632205

21 

V Rama Raju Circuitous Goal of STN deep brain stimulator in Parkinson disease: A study with fusion MRI guided by Computed Axial tomography and microneurosensor recording MER techniquesIp Indian J Neurosci20206322631

22 

V Rama Raju A study of novel molecules for Parkinson‘s disease treatment molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerative complexities and brain protectionIp Indian J Neurosci20206213140

23 

V Rama Raju Stimulus-Atlases: Intraoperative test objectively for discovering optimal electrode site for effective image idea prophecy visualization and DBS stereotactic functional neurosurgeryWolters Kluwer - Medknow283886Neurology India, A publication of Neurological Society of India

24 

RQ Quiroga S Panzeri Principles of Neural Coding (1st edn.)13CRC Press2013153510.1201/b14756

25 

G Buzsaki The origin of extracellular fields and currents-EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikesNat Rev Neurosci20121364072010.1038/nrn3241

26 

FJ Chaure HG Rey RQ Quiroga A novel and fully automatic spike-sorting implementation with variable number of featuresJ Neurophysiol20181204185971

27 

K Dolan H C F Martens P R Schuurman L J Bour Automatic noise-level detection for extra-cellular micro-electrode recordingsMed Biol Eng Comput2009471924110.1038/s41598-020-74196-5

28 

JD Herring G Thut O Jensen TO Bergmann Attention modulates TMS-locked alpha oscillations in the visual cortexJ Neurosci20153543144354710.1523/JNEUROSCI.1833-15.2015

29 

J H Falkenberg J McNames M Aboy KJ Burchiel Segmentation of extracellular microelectrode recordings with equal power. in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society20031-424758

30 

R Quiroga Z Nadasdy Y Ben-Shaul Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clusteringNeural Comput200416816618710.1162/089976604774201631

31 

HW Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance UnknownJ Am Stat Assoc196762 31839940210.1080/01621459.1967.10482916



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 16-01-2022

Accepted : 21-02-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.011


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 745

PDF Downloaded: 282