Get Permission Khamesra: A comparative study to assess neurocognitive functions between off pump and on pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients


Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) causes severe disability and is the most common cause of mortality in the developed and developing world. Coronary artery-bypass graft surgery (CABG), introduced by Rene Favalaro1 in 1967 for myocardial revascularization, is the most frequently performed cardiac surgery.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for reducing angina and stabilizing ventricular dysfunction is performed with two primary techniques: “On-pump” or “Off-pump”. Off-pump procedures, though more technically complex, are thought to be less invasive and only appropriate for a subgroup of CABG candidates. 2, 3 Due to advancement in surgical techniques it has resulted in older patients, and severe CAD patients with comorbid medical conditions being treated with CABG surgery. The cardiac surgery exposes brain to ischemic injury and following CABG, type II complications like deterioration in cognitive function, confusional state, memory deficit, or seizure without a stroke are more frequent than type I (death due to stroke or hypoxic encephalopathy, nonfatal stroke, transient ischemic attack, stupor or coma) and considerable variation in their rates is reported (3-79%). 4, 5 In recent years CABG surgery using off-pump technique has been shown to be a reliable and reproducible technique, and both short and medium term results have been favorable. Post-operative cognitive impairment and decline are associated with CABG.6 The researchers have also reported that the off-pump CABG might be causing fewer cognitive declines than conventional on-pump CABG.7 Whether a participant is classified as having decline or improvement in cognitive functions depends critically on the number of tests required to change from baseline, the amount each must change, and the total number of tests administered. As the number of tests decreases, the fraction that meets criteria for “change” increases dramatically in all of the study groups. There are continuing reasons to monitor the association of CABG with possible postoperative cognitive change as the technology associated with CABG is constantly changing, and the efficacy of these changes in terms of cognitive outcomes should be determined. The expression of both decline and improvement in cognition should be included, along with comparison with appropriate control groups. The emphasis on healthy control group for accurate assessment of the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients scheduled for CABG surgery is necessary if valid assumptions regarding cognitive change are to be made. Without these comparisons, estimates of cognitive decline are greatly overestimated, and virtually uninterpretable. 8

There is substantial evidence that the use of OPCABG is associated with fewer emboli to the brain 9, 10 but the benefits in cognitive outcome are less obvious. In a large randomized study there was no difference in the incidence of decline between patients having CCPB versus OPCABG surgery at 3-12 months. 11 Previous studies have suggested that OPCABG surgery is associated with a lower risk of stroke. 12, 13 To date, there is no randomized trial evidence to suggest a lower incidence of stroke after OPCABG. Very few studies 7, 14 regarding neurocognitive assessment post CABG were found in literature search in India and could not find a single study which has compared cognitive assessment in two “off pump” and “on pump” technique of CABG. The present study, therefore, has been undertaken to compare neurocognitive assessment in patients undergoing “off pump” CABG and “on pump” CABG through neuropsychological tests.

Materials and Methods

The present prospective study was conducted in tertiary care teaching hospital, Bangalore only after taking approval from Institutional Review Board. This hospital is a tertiary level leading cardiac care centre in South India. Informed written consent was obtained from patients selected for participation in this study. In the cardiac groups, participants scheduled to undergo isolated on-pump or off-pump CABG based on standard clinical indications for CABG were screened during one year study period. All right-handedness male patients between 30-65yrs old who can read and write, native speakers of English, Hindi or Kannada were included in study. The patients who were undergoing isolated, primary CABG procedure scheduled within one week were included. All patients who showed potential inability to successfully complete neurocognitive assessments in patients undergoing isolated, primary CABG procedure were excluded out. In control groups, controls having CAD and not undergoing CABG (non surgical cardiac controls-NSCC) and heart healthy controls (HHC-without specific evidence by history of cardiac, cerebrovascular or neurologic disease) were included from inpatient or outpatient of hospital.

Demographic data included age, income, education, and employment were noted. BMI (height, weight), smoking, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, IHD, CHF, dyslipidemia, dysarrhythmias, valvular stenosis, left ventricular clot, medications (acetylsalicylic acid, beta blockers, calcium blockers), vascular disease, comorbid medical illness, previous surgeries, detailed systemic and comprehensive neurological examination (absence of focal neurological deficit including dysphasia), complete blood count (CBC), liver function test (LFT), kidney function test (KFT) including electrolytes, fasting and postprandial sugar (FBS /PPBS), lipid profile, urine complete, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram (ECG), 2D ECHO were also recorded. Medical and neurological evaluation was done before surgery and 6-12 weeks after surgery. Neuropsychological examinations were conducted by a trained evaluator 1-7 days prior and 6-12 weeks after surgery. General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) 15 for psychiatric morbidity and Edinburgh Handedness Inventory 16 questionnaire for quantitative measure of handedness were used.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the OPCABG and CCPB patients and control groups

Parameters OPCABG (N = 44) CCPB (N = 22) NSCC (N = 24) HHC (N = 30) p value
Age (yrs) 54.48 ± 7.13 54.73 ±7.17 53.17±8.35 52.40 ±9.24 0.640
BMI(kg/m2) 24.47 ± 2.03 25.83 ±4.17 24.45±2.79 26.25 ±3.25 0.035*
Duration of IHD less than 1 year (no. of patients) 28 (63.6%) 15(71.4%) 18(75.0%) - >0.05
Duration of surgery (min) 144.1± 31.45 124.6±35.58 - - <0.01*
Time duration for presurgery cognitive assessment (days) 2.48 ±1.81 2.41 ±1.62 2.45 ±1.73 - 0.40
Follow up assess (wk) 8.52 ± 2.62 8.34 ±1.99 8.13 ± 2.28 7.37 ± 1.38 0.153

[i] *p˂0.05 significant

Table 2

Pre and post operative neuropsychological test score in OPCABG, CCPB group and control groups

Domain Test OPCABG CCPB P value NSCC HHC
Motor Speed Finger Tapping Right pre 52.9±6.4 51.53±7.44 0.490 52.13±5.8 54.53±6.17
post 55.63±6.79 52.83±8.34 0.194 53.34±5.26 56.37±5.15
0.005* 0.505 0.336 0.06
Finger Tapping Left pre 47.72±5.6 47.09±5.25 0.698 47.96±6.23 49.7±6.09
post 49.48±6.25 48.94±5.8 0.766 47.43±5.87 51.56±5.56
0.087 0.17 0.748 0.099
Mental Speed Digit Symbol Substitution pre 302±93.13 364.56±147.34 0.060 340.74±135.8 232.27±80.64
post 268±80.75 315.5±128.78 0.100 296.78±108.2 237.87±77.54
0.002* 0.058 0.148 0.467
Sustained Attention Digit Vigilance Time pre 590.12±175.38 602.06±183.76 0.821 657.83±219.02 482±104.46
post 516.02±120.64 577.13±163.67 0.127 570.48±201.06 477.77±101.46
<0.0001* 0.495 0.085 0.818
Digit Vigilance Error pre 8.02±9.51 14.88±18.89 0.074 9.91±7.13 10.1±9.18
post 6.0±5.36 9.5±11.93 0.130 6.78±6.49 5.37±5.9
0.140 0.227 0.137 0.005*
Verbal Fluency Controlled Oral WordAssociation pre 8.95±3.36 8.25±3.27 0.478 8.96±3.75 12.6±3.19
post 9.92±3.43 8.87±3.22 0.297 10.46±3.72 13.03±3.78
0.036* 0.318 0.138 0.375
Category Fluency Animal Names pre 12.32±3.42 11.69±2.82 0.516 12.09±3.64 13.43±3.07
post 13.27±2.82 12.31±3.05 0.266 13.3±2.9 14.47±3.21
0.129 0.295 0.157 0.131
Working Memory Verbal N-Back 1-Back Hits pre 8.76 ± 0.54 8.44 ± 1.09 0.146 8.78±0.67 9.00
post 8.83 ± 0.44 8.75 ± 0.77 0.629 8.91±0.29 9.00
0.498 0.055 0.418 1
Verbal N-Back 2-Back Hits pre 7.1±1.22 6.38 ±2 0.102 6.13±1.94 7.17±1.09
post 6.8±1.57 6.81±1.64 0.987 6.91±1.31 7.47±0.82
0.326 0.323 0.107 0.13
Planning Tower of LondonTotal no. of problems solved with minimum moves pre 8.83±2.39 8.75±1.65 0.904 8±1.57 8.73±1.72
post 9.34±1.93 9.25±1.34 0.863 9±1.41 8.57±1.81
0.098 0.216 0.002* 0.582
Set Shifting Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Total trials pre 96.56±19.44 101.5±19.93 0.396 94.7±20.29 89.9±15.35
post 89.68±20.65 94.25±22.01 0.464 87.96±18.8 83.77±8.89
0.031* 0.217 0.311 0.037*
% of errors pre 24.78±9.57 26.1±9.06 0.636 24.75±13.29 25.02±13.79
post 20.19±10.8 20.46±7.23 0.928 19.37±8.17 18.73±4.33
0.014* 0.04* 0.154 0.014*
% Perseverative responses pre 15.72±7.39 17.81±9.57 0.382 16.48±8.63 14.56±5.88
post 13.11±8.04 12.11±5.71 0.652 13.24±5.49 13.33±5.77
0.068 0.026* 0.157 0.336
% Perseverative error pre 14.25±6.2 15.2±6.71 0.614 14.55±7.17 12.93±4.57
post 11.72±6.25 11.14±4.69 0.735 11.92±4.62 11.52±3.87
0.029* 0.041* 0.171 0.113
% Non-Perseverative error pre 10.52±5.43 10.79±4.99 0.866 10.19±7.85 8.42±4.84
post 8.9±5.89 9.48±4.71 0.728 7.36±4.87 7.15±2.44
0.121 0.417 0.186 0.127
% Conceptual responses pre 66.33±12.92 64.55±12.5 0.640 66.32±16.62 70.39±9.35
post 71.58±14.39 70.5±10.91 0.787 72.91±11 74.8±5.76
0.039* 0.117 0.168 0.004*

Table 3

Continue (Table 2)

Response Inhibition Stroop effect pre 177.98±74.94 194±72.82 0.468 171.96±59.11 165.77±60.16
post 154.95±73.56 148.25±59.25 0.746 169.26±48.76 149.83±55.92
0.052 0.028* 0.853 0.112
Comprehension Token pre 32.61±2.37 33.44±2 0.222 32±2.28 33.57±2.19
post 33.41±2.63 34.06±2.17 0.385 33.52±2.09 34.07±1.76
0.081 0.343 0.022* 0.113
Verbal Learning Auditory Verbal LearningTotal pre 49.73±7.84 47.06±11.89 0.325 50.39±13.76 55.47±7.3
post 56.83±8.03 53.13±11.82 0.178 51.91±8.54 56.2±8.13
<0.0001* 0.012* 0.682 0.562
Verbal Memory Immediate recall pre 10.29±2.75 9.06±3.75 0.178 10.57±3.12 12.47±2.01
post 12.12±2.56 10.63±2.87 0.060 10.22±2.76 12.47±2.13
<0.0001* 0.08 0.663 1
Delayed recall pre 10.32±2.72 9.69±3.44 0.470 10.09±3.32 12.2±1.99
post 12.34±2.1 11.25 ± 2.91 0.121 10.74±2.78 12.43±2.22
<0.0001* 0.073 0.491 0.527
Long term percent retention pre 85.28±18.72 84.4±19.59 0.876 83.61±19.77 88.97±10.34
post 94.85±10.11 91.65±16.58 0.379 86.26±19.01 90.52±11.24
0.003* 0.207 0.677 0.404
Recognition hits pre 14.12±1.36 13.19±2.9 0.103 14.09±1.47 14.67±0.99
post 14.54±1.0 14.19±1.56 0.320 14.26±1.39 14.73±0.94
0.033* 0.052 0.707 0.536
Visuocon Struction Ability Complex Figure Test – Copy pre 34.88±1.6 33.13±4.57 0.035* 33.87±4.56 35.8±0.81
post 34.83±2.13 33±6.77 0.120 35±2.97 36±0
0.865 0.92 0.168 0.184
Visual Memory Immediate recall pre 20.29±7.55 16.31±8.05 0.085 18.48±7.79 21.4±5.01
post 24.39±7.14 20.44±7.58 0.070 21.74±7.10 24.63±6.01
<0.0001* 0.012* 0.082 0.001*
Delayed recall pre 19.93±7.08 16.38±7.69 0.102 17.83±7.66 21.27±5.19
post 23.83±7.79 21.06±8.57 0.246 21.04±7.37 24.67±6.38
<0.0001* 0.006* 0.08 0.001*

[i] *p˂0.05significant

Table 4

Postoperative neuropsychological deficits in OPCABG and CCPB

≥ 20% decline No. of domain OPCABG (N = 41) CCPB (N = 16)
None 0 3 (7.3%) 0 ( 0 )
Mild 1 - 2 31 (75.6%) 13 (81.3%)
Moderate 3 - 4 6 (14.6%) 2 (12.5%)
Severe ≥ 5 1 (2.44%) 1 (6.25%)
Total ≥ 3 7 (17.0%) 3 (18.7%)

All consenting CABG patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent neurocognitive testing at baseline and 6-12 weeks after surgery. Each study subject was tested on all occasions by the same experienced psychometrician in a comfortable, well-lit environment generally free from visual and auditory distractions over approximately 3 hours with adequate rest pauses. The following cognitive domains were assessed: fine motor dexterity (finger tapping - dominant and non-dominant hands); mental processing speed (digit symbol); sustained attention (digit vigilance); fluency or language (category and phonemic fluency); working memory (verbal); planning; set-shifting; response inhibition; and learning and memory (verbal and visual). Some of these are paper-pencil tests. The tests used for the present study have been standardized for use in the Indian population. 17

Finger tapping test, digit-symbol substitution test, digit vigilance test, verbal (phonemic) fluency cowa test, animal names test, N-back: verbal test , tower of london test, wisconsin card sorting test, stroop color-word test, verval comprehension token test, auditory verbal learning test, complex figure test for assessing speed, attention, executive functions, auditory comprehension, learning, construction ability, memory were used.

CABG surgery with CPB (CCPB) and CABG surgery without CPB (OPCABG) were done by expert cardiothoracic surgeons. Along with a daily clinical neurological evaluation on the five first postoperative days, data from the notes were used to perform a diagnosis of delirium. Most patients were discharged by the 8th postoperative day. Data for blood chemistry, blood transfusion, use of ionotropes, medical and surgical complications and length of stay were collected. All patients were followed from the day prior to surgery until the day 84th (12 weeks) after surgery. At follow up, repeat biochemistry, ECG, chest X-ray, 2D-ECHO, MRI brain and neuropsychological assessment were performed.

Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical software package (Statistical product and services solutions version 17; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill) for Windows. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p-value <0.05. The raw scores were compared with the NIMHANS normative data. 17 Both continuous and categorical forms of the distribution variables were used in the analysis. Differences between continuous variables and categorical variables were assessed using the Student t-test and the chi-square test respectively. Univariate analysis techniques were used to find out the mean difference. Analysis of variance is used to test the hypothesis that several means are equal. The Paired-Samples T Test procedure compares the means of two variables for a single group. The procedure computes the differences between values of the two variables for each case and tests whether the average differs from 0.

Results

Forty four patients underwent off-pump (OPCABG) and twenty two patients underwent on-pump (CCPB) surgery. Age, body mass index (BMI) was comparable in OPCABG and CCPB but it was significantly high in HHC control group. The time duration of surgery was significantly more in OPCABG and CCPB groups. (p<0.01) Duration of presurgery cognitive assessment, pre post assessment (6-12 weeks) was comparable in all the groups. (Table 1)

41(93%) OPCABG patients, and 16(72%) CCPB patients were assessed pre and post cardiac surgery. Post surgery neuropsychological assessment in 3 OPCABG and 6 CCPB patients could not be carried out due to the following reasons: nonresponders (2 patients), death (1 patient), health problem (1 patient), lack of interest (3 patients), and lack of transportation (2 patients).

On all the neuropsychological tests in pre operative assessment both the groups were comparable except OPCABG group had significantly improved visuoconstruction ability over CCPB group (p=0.035). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative scores for the two groups in any of the neuropsychological tests. (p>0.05)

In present study, OPCABG patients had significantly improved from baseline for motor speed, mental speed, sustained attention, verbal fluency, set shifting, verbal learning, verbal memory, visual memory tests. (p˂0.05) In CCPB group, patients improved from baseline in few tests like set shifting, response inhibition, verbal learning, visual memory (p˂0.05) and did not show difference in rest of the tests. In NSCC group significant change found in comprehension and visual memory only and HHC group it was significant in set shifting, sustained attention and visual memory. (Table 2, Table 3 )

Mild cognitive decline (one or two tests) was observed in 31(75.6%) of 41 OPCABG and 13(81.3%) of 16 CCPB group. A moderate or severe degree of neuropsychological dysfunction (≥3 tests) was seen in 7(17%) of 41 OPCABG, 3(18.7%) of 16 CCPB group. (Table 4)

Discussion

Cognitive dysfunction after CABG is characterized by impairment of attention, concentration, and memory with possible long-term implications. 18 In present study fourteen tests assessed the six important domains of cognitive function. Number of tests used was much higher than other comparable studies where usually only 4-5 domains of cognitive function were studied using 6 to 10 tests.19, 20 We also attempted to measure motor function (finger tapping test) as suggested by 1995 Consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes 21 and visual memory functioning - reproduction of drawing, an important area of cognitive function, often not evaluated in other comparable studies.

In present study OPCABG patients’ cognitive performance before surgery was largely within the normal range when compared to normative data 17 for age, gender and education. Patients who underwent CCPB had reduced scores in most of the domains compared with normative data. 17 Similar findings were found by Ernest et al. 22 This shows the importance of control for medical and demographic factors because even after excluding patients at high risk for brain dysfunction, cognitive impairment is found in patients with CAD before surgery.

There were no significant differences between OPCABG and CCPB groups in cognitive performance at baseline except OPCABG group which had significantly improved visuoconstruction ability over CCPB group (p=0.035). Postoperatively neuropsychological assessment showed no significant decrease in mean scores after OPCABG or CCPB surgery.

In the present study, clear improvement / advantage was observed for the short-term effect of the off-pump procedure. OPCABG patients showed significant improvement in 8 tests. The CCPB showed significant improvement in 4 tests, mean score improvement in 3 and remained stable in rest 7 tests. Studies reveal similar changes of either OPCABG showing better performance 23 or no change with CCPB 11, 24 on 6 -12 weeks follow-up assessment. Zamvar et al 23 found that patients undergoing OPCABG had less neurocognitive impairment at 1 and 10 weeks than did patients in the CCPB group. van Dijk et al 11 also found no differences between the two procedures in terms of cognitive decline in 3-month and 12-month follow-ups. The findings of improvement in cognition after CABG in the present study are consistent with several recent studies. 25, 26, 27

The present study results showed improvement in response inhibition (Stroop test) as well as in motor and mental speed, attention / concentration, verbal fluency, executive functions and learning and memory both verbal and visual in both the group of the CABG patients at 6-12 weeks follow-up. The mean change in Stroop effect score of 23 in OPCABG, 46 in CCPB corresponds improvement from their baseline (p=0.052, p=0.028).

More specifically, longitudinal models in the present study showed that the digit symbol (processing speed), digit vigilance, verbal fluency, verbal learning and memory and visuoconstruction ability and visual memory recall being significantly different in both the groups at 6-12 weeks follow-up.

Intra-individual variations were analyzed in all subjects in all tests comparing baseline to follow-up scores. Our results of more than 20% decline on 3 or more tests at 6-12 weeks were seen in 17% OPCABG and 18.7% CCPB patients. The cognitive decline in present study at 6-12 weeks in OPCABG was comparable to results of meta-analysis of nine trials. 28 However, in our study cognitive decline in the CCPB group was significantly less than other RCT.

Researchers have reported early transient and reversible cognitive decline after CABG, mild but non-significant trend toward late postoperative decline for all study groups with CAD but no significant differences of late postoperative cognitive decline after CCPB or OPCABG. This suggests, as also reported earlier that CAD and the presumed coexisting cerebrovascular disease may be associated with mild decline in performance for some cognitive domains even in the absence of surgery. 29, 30 Sweet and colleagues 31 also concluded no clear pattern of group differences or change in neuropsychological outcomes at follow-ups and that CABG surgery does not create cognitive decline.

From a neurological standpoint, CABG as currently practiced is a safe and effective procedure for the great majority of patients. Nonetheless, a subset of patients with pre-existing risk factors for cerebrovascular disease is at high risk for stroke or encephalopathy. In addition, before surgery, very little is known about the status of not only the vasculature of the brain but also the existence of previous underlying cerebrovascular disease. We suggest that neurologists have a role in assisting their colleagues in cardiology and cardiac surgery to identify those at risk for adverse neurological outcomes. In addition, they need to be involved in evaluating patients after surgery for change in neurological condition, both by examination and interpretation of imaging studies. Most important, neurologists should be involved in the design and interpretation of studies comparing different intervention techniques, modification of existing procedures, and trials of neuroprotective agents.

Limitations: Studies with large sample size of both OPCABG and CCPB and long term follow up with neurocognitive assessment should be conducted in future.

Conclusions

The lack of significant differences in the longitudinal test performance postoperatively between the CCPB and OPCABG group in present study suggests that the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is not the sole source of cognitive change after surgery.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

R G Favalaro Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative techniquesAnn Thorac Surg196853349

2 

Muhammad Shahzeb Khan Mohammad Yousuf-ul Islam Muhammad Umer Ahmed Faizan Imran Bawany Asadullah Khan Mohammad Hussham Arshad On Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A ReviewGlob J Health Sci20146318693

3 

Antony George Jitumoni Baishya Jayaprakash Krishnamoorthy Geetha Muniraju Murali Chakravarthy Minimally invasive compared to conventional approach for coronary artery bypass grafting improves outcomeAnn Card Anaesth 20172015760

4 

Gary W. Roach Marc Kanchuger Christina Mora Mangano Mark Newman Nancy Nussmeier Richard Wolman Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Bypass SurgeryN Engl J Med 199633525185763

5 

R L Wolman N A Nussmeier A Aggarwal M S Kanchuger G W Roach M Newman Cerebral injury after cardiac surgery: identification of a group at extraordinary riskStroke19993051422

6 

Danielle Greaves Peter J. Psaltis Tyler J. Ross Daniel Davis Ashleigh E. Smith Monique S. Boord Cognitive outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 91,829 patientsInt J Cardiol2019289439

7 

M Chakravarthy V Manjunath V Jawali T Patil K Jayaprakash P Kalligudd Neurocognitive behaviour changes in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery - a prospective observational studyJ Anaesth Clin Pharmacol20082414952

8 

Ola A. Selnes Luu Pham Scott Zeger Guy M. McKhann Defining Cognitive Change After CABG: Decline Versus Normal VariabilityAnn Thorac Surg 200682238890

9 

B. Jason Bowles Jeffrey D. Lee Collin R. Dang Sharyl N. Taoka E. William Johnson Eileen M. Lau Coronary Artery Bypass Performed Without the Use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Is Associated With Reduced Cerebral Microemboli and Improved Clinical ResultsChest200111912530

10 

Christian Lund Per K Hol Runar Lundblad Erik Fosse Kjetil Sundet Bjørn Tennøe Comparison of cerebral embolization during off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgeryAnn Thorac Surg200376376570

11 

D. Van Dijk E.W.L. Jansen R. Hijman Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized trialJAMA2002287140512

12 

Sotiris C Stamou Kathleen A Jablonski Albert J Pfister Peter C Hill Mercedes K.C Dullum Ammar S Bafi Stroke after conventional versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypassAnn Thorac Surg 20027423949

13 

Garrett K. Peel Sotiris C. Stamou Mercedes K.C. Dullum Peter C. Hill Kathleen A. Jablonski Ammar S. Bafi Chronologic distribution of stroke after minimally invasive versus conventional coronary artery bypassJ Am Coll Cardiol 20044357526

14 

S P Antony N Jamuna S M Kini M Chakravarthy Neuropsychological deficits in patients with myocardial infarctionNeuropsychological Trends201073750

15 

D P Goldberg P Williams A user’s guide to the general health questionnaireBerkshire, Windsor (UK): NFER-Nelson1988

16 

R.C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventoryNeuropsychol19719197113

17 

S L Rao D K Subbakrishna K Gopukumar NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery-2004 ManualNIMHANS PublicationBangalore (India)2004

18 

S Yuan H Lin Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graftingBraz J Cardiovasc Surg20193417684

19 

D A Stump S P Newman L H Coker J H Phipps C C Miller Persistence of neuropsychological deficits following CABGAnesth1990733AA113

20 

D Barbut R B Hinton T P Szatrowski G S Hartman M Bruefach P Williams-Russo Cerebral emboli detected during bypass surgery are associated with clamp removal.Stroke1994251223982402

21 

John M. Murkin Stanton P. Newman David A. Stump James A. Blumenthal Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgeryAnn Thorac Surg 1995595128995

22 

Christine S. Ernest Barbara M. Murphy Marian U.C. Worcester Rosemary O. Higgins Peter C. Elliott Alan J. Goble Cognitive Function in Candidates for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryAnn Thorac Surg20068238128

23 

V. Zamvar Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trialBMJ20023257375126871

24 

Ola A. Selnes Guy M. McKhann Neurocognitive complications after coronary artery bypass surgeryAnn Neurol 200557561521

25 

Diederik van Dijk Monique Spoor Ron Hijman Hendrik M. Nathoe Cornelius Borst Erik W. L. Jansen Diederick E. Grobbee Peter P. T. de Jaegere Cor J. Kalkman for the Octopus Study Group Cognitive and Cardiac Outcomes 5 Years After Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryJAMA200729777017010098-748410.1001/jama.297.7.701American Medical Association (AMA)https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.7.701

26 

N Stroobantab G Van Nootena D D Bacquerc Y V Belleghema G Vingerhoets Neuropsychological functioning 3-5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: does the pump make a difference?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008342396401

27 

A. Laurie Shroyer Frederick L. Grover Brack Hattler Joseph F. Collins Gerald O. McDonald Elizabeth Kozora On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass SurgeryN Engl J Med 200936119182737

28 

Hisato Takagi Toshiyuki Tanabashi Norikazu Kawai Takuya Umemoto Cognitive decline after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 200713425123

29 

Tomoko Goto Tomoko Baba Keiko Honma Yoshihiro Shibata Yoshio Arai Hideaki Uozumi Magnetic resonance imaging findings and postoperative neurologic dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graftingAnn Thorac Surg 200172113742

30 

Sarah E. Vermeer Niels D. Prins Tom den Heijer Albert Hofman Peter J. Koudstaal Monique M.B. Breteler Silent Brain Infarcts and the Risk of Dementia and Cognitive DeclineN Engl J Med 200334813121522

31 

Jerry J. Sweet Eileen Finnin Penny L. Wolfe Jennifer L. Beaumont Elizabeth Hahn Jesse Marymont Absence of Cognitive Decline One Year After Coronary Bypass Surgery: Comparison to Nonsurgical and Healthy ControlsAnn Thorac Surg200885515718



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijn.2020.022


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1287

PDF Downloaded: 602