- Received November 30, -0001
- Accepted November 30, -0001
- Publication July 20, 2020
- Visibility 5 Views
- Downloads 1 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijn.2020.007
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Yoga and mental health: A controlled study of effectiveness
- Author Details:
-
Chodagiri Vamsi Krishna
-
Pamarthi Krishna Das *
Introduction
"Yoga" means union, derived from Sanskrit literature Yuj. Or to join, and to direct and concentrate one's attention.[1], [2] In earlier days Various practice of yoga was first introduced by Patanjali.[2], [3] In yoga sutras, an eightfold path to awareness and enlightenment called ashtanga," described by Patanjali[2], [4]
In western countries nowadays yoga is considered an alternative holistic approach to maintain good health.[5]
Yoga integrates an individual's psychological and spiritual components to improve health, particularly stress-related problems.[6] Earlier studies have evidenced that stress is responsible for the development of various diseases.[7] Both yoga practices and clinical trials have been proven to reduce complications.
Various psychotic conditions are alleviated by yoga.[8] Yoga influence one to relax, slow the breath and focus on the present. It balances the nervous system, to induce the flight-or-fight response and the relaxation response.[9] Yoga can restore all physiological conditions and increases blood flow to the intestines and vital organs. Earlier one scientific study (10 h) introduced by Iyengar has shown improvement in self-reported acute mood states of depression traits.[10], [11] Psychological problems impact susceptibility to causing of diseases.[12], [13] Practicing yoga and meditation reflects and manage abnormalities aassociated with diseases.[14], [15]
In our study, we evaluate the effect of yoga in reducing the depression and also find out a relation between various socio-demographic parameters with a level of depression to improve the quality of life.
Materials and Methods
Study Setting
The study carried out at Vijayawada.
Study population
In total study population (84) only 60 were in included. 60 were distributed into two groups; study group (30) and control group (30).
| Group | Pre-test | Yoga Intervention | Post-test |
| Study | √ | Given | √ |
| Control | √ | Not given | √ |
Sampling criteria
Inclusion criteria
Volunteers attending the yoga center.
Volunteers who were interested and physically able to do Yoga.
Volunteers who could come for follow up after one month.
Volunteers between the age group of 18 - 60yrs.
Volunteers who gave written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Volunteers with severe psychiatric illness, neurological disorder and, other severe medical conditions.
Volunteers who were practicing Yoga currently.
Volunteers who were having the present history of substance abuse excluding nicotine.
Depression and quality of life assessed by specific methods.[16], [17], [18], [19]
Practicing of Yoga Therapy
Yoga module-45 mins duration by different asanas followed by;
Breath awareness followed by 3 times OM chanting (2 mins)
II.Breathing exercises: (5 mins)
Standing postures: (3 mins)
Full Yogic breathing (3 mins)
Sitting postures: (2 mins)
Prone and Supine postures (2 mins)
Yoga Nidra ( 15mins)
Pranayama (10 mins)
PranavaJapa (3 mins)
Follow up
We followed through telephone and also maintained a register about the duration and the number of days of subjects Yoga practice.
Post assessment
Volunteers in the study and control group were evaluated at 4 weeks on depression and quality of life on the above- mentioned scales.
Data analysis
Compare the pre and post-test scores between groups (i.e. control and study group) on the level of depression and quality of life by’t’ test
Results and Observations
| Variables | Group | P- value | ||||
| Control (n=30) | Experimental (n=30) | |||||
| Number | % | Number | % | |||
| Age | < 35 yrs | 15 | 50 | 16 | 53.3 | .798 |
| >35yrs | 15 | 50 | 14 | 46.7 | ||
| Sex | Male | 17 | 56.6 | 18 | 60 | |
| Female | 13 | 43.3 | 12 | 40 | .795 | |
| Education | ||||||
| Inter and below | 14 | 46.7 | 12 | 40 | .605 | |
| Above intermediate | 16 | 53.3 | 18 | 60 | ||
| Occupation | ||||||
| Earning | 20 | 66.6 | 22 | 73.3 | .576 | |
| Non earning | 10 | 33.3 | 8 | 26.6 | ||
| Marital status | Married | 19 | 63.3 | 22 | 73.3 | |
| Unmarried | 11 | 36.6 | 8 | 26.6 | .409 |
In both study and control groups peoples equally distributed respectively according to their age. In the study group, 53.3% of people were more than 35 years. We observed no significant difference in the age distribution of volunteers among the control and study group. There was male domination were seen in both study (60%) and control group (56.6%). Intermediate and below intermediate is the education level in both the groups. There was no statistically significant in the above parameters of both groups. In both the group more approximately 65% of people were earning and married.
| Group | t-value | p-value | ||
| Control (n=30) | Study (n=30) | |||
| Mean ± S.D | Mean ± S.D | |||
| Depression | 10.70 ±3.48 | 11.50 ±4.10 | 0.813 | 0.419 |
We observed that the depression levels of volunteers in the control and study group didn't differ significantly (p=0.419, for depression). ([Table 3])
| Domains | Group | t-value | ||
| Control (n=30) | Study group(n=30) | p-value | ||
| Mean ± S.D | Mean ± S.D | |||
| 1. Physical Health | 14.10± 1.72 | 14.90 ±1.51 | 1.99 | 0.06 |
| 2. Psychological | 10.23 ±1.59 | 10.93 ± 0.92 | .099 | 0.92 |
| 3.Social Relationship | 10.06 ± 1.08 | 10.40 ± 0.89 | 1.302 | 0.19 |
| 4. Environment | 11.40 ±1.58 | 11.23 ± 1.04 | .481 | 0.63 |
The present results revealed that there was no difference between the control and study group on the overall quality of life among volunteers attending the yoga center at the pre-test level. ([Table 4])
| Depression | Severe 19-22 | Chi square value | p-value | ||||
| 1 Variables | Normal 0-7 | Mild 8-13 | Moderate 14-18 | ||||
| Number (%) | |||||||
| Age | < 35 yrs | 5 (38) | 16 (51) | 9 (60) | 1 (50) | 0.88 | 0.829 |
| > 35 yrs | 7 (62) | 15 (49) | 6 (40) | 1 (50) | |||
| Sex | Male | 5 (38) | 20 (64) | 9 (60) | 1 (50) | 1.901 | 0.593 |
| Female | 7 (62) | 11 (36) | 6 (40) | 1 (50) | |||
| Education | 2.676 | 0.444 | |||||
| Inter and below | 5 (38) | 13 (41) | 6 (40) | 2 (100) | |||
| Above intermediate | 7 (62) | 18 (59) | 9 (60) | 0 | |||
| Occupation | 1.699 | 0.637 | |||||
| Earning | 7 (62) | 22 (71) | 11 (73) | 2 (100) | |||
| Non earning | 5 (38) | 9 (29) | 4 (27) | 0 | |||
| Marital status | married | 10 (83) | 19 (61) | 11 (73) | 1 (50) | 2.402 | 0.493 |
| Un married | 2 (17) | 12 (39) | 4 (27) | 1 (50) |
The above finding shows that no relation between socio-demographic parameters and depression.
| Variables | Control Group (n=30) | t -value | ||
| Pre-test | Post test | p-valuee | ||
| Mean ± S.D | Mean± S.D | |||
| Depression | 10.70 ±3.48 | 10.46±3.15 | 1.756 | 0.09 |
| Quality of life (Domains) | ||||
| 1. Physical Health | 14.10 ± 1.72 | 13.70±1.12 | 1.795 | 0.08 |
| 2. Psychological Health | 10.23 ± 1.59 | 10.16±0.46 | 0.254 | 0.80 |
| 3. Social Relationship | 10.06 ± 1.08 | 9.83 ± 0.37 | 1.424 | 0.16 |
| 4. Environment | 11.40 ± 1.58 | 10.83±0.46 | 1.876 | 0.07 |
The levels of depression and all the domains do not differ significantly between pre and post-assessments in the control group (p=0.09 respectively). ([Table 6])
| Variables | Study (n=30) | t -value | ||
| Pre-test | Post test | p-value | ||
| Mean ± S.D | Mean± S.D | |||
| Depression | 11.50 ±4.10 | 6.40±2.71 | 11.721 | <0.001* |
| Quality of life (Domains) | ||||
| 1. Physical Health | 14.90±1.51 | 18.70±1.26 | 10.746 | <0.001* |
| 2. Psychological Health | 10.20 ± 0.92 | 14.56±1.47 | 14.681 | <0.001* |
| 3. Social Relationship | 10.40 ± 0.89 | 14.53± 0.86 | 18.492 | <0.001* |
| 4.Environment | 11.23 ± 1.04 | 15.36±1.24 | 14.628 | <0.001* |
| *significant |
After post assessment, both depression and quality of life improved 11.50 vs 6.40 in the study group (p<0.001).
| Parameters | Groups | |||
| Control (n=23) | Study (n=20) | t-value | p-value | |
| Mean ± S.D | Mean ± S.D | |||
| Depression | 10.46 ±3.15 | 6.40 ±2.71 | 5.35 | <0.001* |
| Quality of life (Domains) | ||||
| 1. Physical Health | 13.70 ±1.14 | 18.70 ±1.26 | 16.03 | <0.001* |
| 2.Psychological Health | 10.16 ±0.46 | 14.56 ±1.47 | 15.56 | <0.001* |
| 3.Social Relationship | 9.83 ±0.37 | 14.53 ±0.86 | 27.38 | <0.001* |
| 4.Environment | 10.83 ±0.46 | 15.36 ±1.24 | 19.09 | <0.001* |
Both in the control and study group, there was a significantly lower level of depression and higher quality after a Yoga intervention. ([Table 8])
Discussion
The present study is to find out the better alternative method to reduce depression and improve the quality of life among volunteers attending the yoga center. The mean score of depression in the control group was 10.70 and in the study group was 11.50. In both groups, there was no statistically significant difference in depression levels of patients (p=0.449 respectively for depression). The Number of people shown an abnormal level of depression in both groups. These studies accordance with the previous findings reported by Choi et al., (2011).[18]
Our studies depict that, there was no significant difference between the control and study groups on the overall quality of life concerning four domains. There was no positive correlation between the various demographic variables and level of depression.
The pre and post-test mean scores of depression were 10.70 &10.46. Depression levels do not differ significantly between pre and post-assessments in the control group (p = 0.06 & p=0.09 respectively). All domains of quality of life did not differ significantly between pre and post-assessments in the control group. Whereas, depression level was also significantly lower at the post-assessment, 11.50 vs. 6.40 (p<0.00l) and also a significant improvement in the quality of life of all four domains in the study group. Our results were similar to Waelde et al (2004)[20] & Lee et al (2004).[21]
The mean score of depression in the control & study group was 10.46 and 6.40. Quality of life was evaluated under four domains. All demographic parameters have different mean scores. Our findings stated that there was a significantly lower level of depression and significantly higher quality of life in the experimental group after a Yoga intervention.
Our finding correlates with the previous studies reported by Kozasa et al (2008)[22] Janakiramaiah et al (2000)[23] and Sharma et al (2006).[24] These reports were predicted that yoga was more prominent to reduce some psychological problems.
Previous findings reported that various features of physical health such as fatigue, pain, work capacity sleep and activities of daily life improved by integrated yoga.[25], [26] There was an improvement seen in the psychological domain[27]
Social health problems such as interpersonal relationships and social support are the most important causes of depression and anxiety.[24], [28], [29]
Several environmental related problems such as pollution, financial resources were cured by yoga. Yoga (Bhagavad Gita) says that yoga results in equanimity and balance (Samatvam) that can help in better tolerance to environmental changes (Sheetaushnasamah – tolerance to heat and cold).[30], [31], [32]
Conclusion
Finally, we concluded that Yoga has positive effect on decreasing depression and improving the quality of life among volunteers attending the yoga center. In the present scenario of increasing stress in the people despite the advances in health technologies, simple but planned Yoga intervention by psychiatrists has a significant scope in reducing depression.
Acknowledgment
The author would like thank to the Dept of Psychiatry, SMC and yoga center for providing all the necessary facilities to carry out the study.
Source of funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- J Lasater. The heart of Pantajali. Yoga J 1997. [Google Scholar]
- James A. Raub. Psychophysiologic Effects of Hatha Yoga on Musculoskeletal and Cardiopulmonary Function: A Literature Review. J Altern Complement Med 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Kausthub Desikachar, Liz Bragdon, Chase Bossart. The Yoga of Healing: Exploring Yoga's Holistic Model for Health and Well-being. Int J Yoga Ther 2005. [Google Scholar]
- G Maehle. Ashtanga Yoga: Practice and Philosophy: Analoo City. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- K Williams, L Steinberg, J Petronis. Therapeutic application of Iyengar yoga for healing chronic low back pain. Int J Yoga Ther 2003. [Google Scholar]
- N L Atkinson, R Permuth-Levine. Benefits, barriers, and cues to the action of yoga practice: A focus group approach. Am J Health Behav 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jens Granath, Sara Ingvarsson, Ulrica von Thiele, Ulf Lundberg. Stress Management: A Randomized Study of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Yoga. Cognitive Behaviour Ther 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Karen Pilkington, Graham Kirkwood, Hagen Rampes, Janet Richardson. Yoga for depression: The research evidence. J Affective Disord 2005. [Google Scholar]
- T Mccall. . Bantam Dell a division of Random House Inc 2007. [Google Scholar]
- A Vedamurthachar, N Janakiramaiah, J Hegde, T Shetty, D Subbakrishna, S Sureshbabu. Antidepressant efficacy and hormonal effects of Sudarshana Kriya Yoga (SKY) in alcohol dependent individuals. J Affect Disord 2006. [Google Scholar]
- A Woolery, H Myers, B Stemliebm, L Zeltzer. A yoga intervention for young adults with elevated symptoms of depression. Altern Ther Health Med 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sarika Arora, Jayashree Bhattacharjee. Modulation of immune responses in stress by Yoga. Int J Yoga 2008. [Google Scholar]
- M. Javnbakht, R. Hejazi Kenari, M. Ghasemi. Effects of yoga on depression and anxiety of women. Complement Ther Clinl Pract 2009. [Google Scholar]
- B S Oken, D Zajdel, S Kishiyama, K Flegal, C Dehen, M Haas. Randomized, controlled, six-month trial of yoga in healthy seniors: effects on cognition and quality of life. Altern Ther Health Med 2006. [Google Scholar]
- A Michalsen, P Grossman, A Acil, J Langhorst, R Lüdtke, T Esch. Rapid stress reduction and anxiolysis among distressed women as a consequence of a three-month intensive yoga program. Med Sci Monit 2005. [Google Scholar]
- M. Power, , M. Bullinger, A. Harper. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide.. Health Psychology 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- . 18.WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Med 1998. [Google Scholar]
- S K Choi, S J Min, M S Cho, H Joung, S M Park. Anxiety and depression among North Korean young defectors in South Korea and their association with health-related quality of life. Yonsei Med J 2011. [Google Scholar]
- . 17.World health organization.WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Lynn C. Waelde, Larry Thompson, Dolores Gallagher-Thompson. A pilot study of a yoga and meditation intervention for dementia caregiver stress. J Clin Psychol 2004. [Google Scholar]
- S W Lee, C A Mancuso, M E. A Prospective study of new participants in a community-based mind-body training program. J General Inter Med 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Elisa Harumi Kozasa, Ruth Ferreira Santos, Adriana Dourado Rueda, Ana Amélia Benedito-Silva, Felipe Leite De Moraes Ornellas, José Roberto Leite. Evaluation of Siddha Samadhi Yoga for Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: A Preliminary Study. Psychological Rep 2008. [Google Scholar]
- N Janakiramaiah, B N Gangadhar, Naga Venkatesha Murthy, P J. Therapeutic efficacy of Sudharshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) in dysthymic disorder. NIMHANS J 1998. [Google Scholar]
- V K Sharma, S Das, S Mondal, U Goswami. An Effect of Sahaj Yoga on depressive disorders. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2005. [Google Scholar]
- P Raghuraj, S Telles. Muscle power, dexterity skill and visual perception in community home girls trained yoga or sports and in regular schools. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1997. [Google Scholar]
- S Telles, P Raghuraj, A Ghosh, H R Nagendra. Effect of yoga on performance in a mirror tracing task. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- S Telles, R Nagrathna, H R Nagendra. Improvement in visual perception following yoga training. J Indian Psychol 1995. [Google Scholar]
- John J. Miller, Ken Fletcher, Jon Kabat-Zinn. Three-year follow-up and clinical implications of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction intervention in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Gen Hospital Psychiatry 1995. [Google Scholar]
- S Telles, R Nagarathna, H R Nagendra. Autonomic changes during om meditation. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1995. [Google Scholar]
- S Telles, R Nagarathna, H R Nagendra. Breathing through a particular nostril can alter metabolism and autonomic activities. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1994. [Google Scholar]
- S Telles, R B Srinivas. Autonomic and respiratory measures in children with impaired vision following yoga and physical activity programs. Int J Rehabil Health 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Shirley Telles, S. Narendran, P. Raghuraj, R. Nagarathna, H. R. Nagendra. Comparison of Changes in Autonomic and Respiratory Parameters of Girls after Yoga and Games at a Community Home. Perceptual Motor Skills 1997. [Google Scholar]